06.01.2015 Views

The Real And Complex Number Systems

The Real And Complex Number Systems

The Real And Complex Number Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(d) If U V, every subsequnce of a n converges to U.<br />

Proof: By(a)and(b),given 0, then there exists a positive integer N 1 such that as<br />

n ≥ N 1 ,wehave<br />

a n U <br />

and there exists a positive integer N 2 such that as n ≥ N 2 ,wehave<br />

U − a n .<br />

Hence, as n ≥ maxN 1 , N 2 ,wehave<br />

U − a n U .<br />

That is, a n is a convergent sequence with limit U. So, every subsequnce of a n <br />

converges to U.<br />

8.2 Given two real-valed sequence a n and b n bounded below. Prove hat<br />

(a) lim sup n→ a n b n ≤ lim sup n→ a n lim sup n→ b n .<br />

Proof: Note that a n and b n bounded below, we have lim sup n→ a n or is<br />

finite. <strong>And</strong> lim sup n→ b n or is finite. It is clear if one of these limit superior is ,<br />

sowemayassumethatbotharefinite.Leta lim sup n→ a n and b lim sup n→ b n . <strong>The</strong>n<br />

given 0, there exists a positive integer N such that as n ≥ N, wehave<br />

a n b n a b /2. *<br />

In addition, let c lim sup n→ a n b n ,wherec by (*). So, for the same 0, and<br />

given m N there exists a positive integer K such that as K ≥ N, wehave<br />

c − /2 a K b K . **<br />

By (*) and (**), we obtain that<br />

c − /2 a K b K a b /2<br />

which implies that<br />

c ≤ a b<br />

since is arbitrary. So,<br />

lim sup a n b n ≤ lim sup a n lim sup b n.<br />

n→ n→ n→<br />

Remark: (1) <strong>The</strong> equality may NOT hold. For example,<br />

a n −1 n and b n −1 n1 .<br />

(2) <strong>The</strong> reader should noted that the finitely many terms does NOT change the relation<br />

of order. <strong>The</strong> fact is based on process of proof.<br />

(b) lim sup n→ a n b n ≤ lim sup n→ a n lim sup n→ b n if a n 0, b n 0 for all n, and<br />

if both lim sup n→ a n and lim sup n→ b n are finite or both are infinite.<br />

Proof: Let lim sup n→ a n a and lim sup n→ b n b. It is clear that we may assume<br />

that a and b are finite. Given 0, there exists a positive integer N such that as n ≥ N,<br />

we have<br />

a n b n a b ab a b . *<br />

In addition, let c lim sup n→ a n b n ,wherec by (*). So, for the same 0, and<br />

given m N there exists a positive integer K such that as K ≥ N, wehave<br />

c − a K b K . **<br />

By (*) and (**), we obtain that<br />

c − a K b K a b a b

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!