06.01.2015 Views

The Real And Complex Number Systems

The Real And Complex Number Systems

The Real And Complex Number Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

know that S x, y : x 0. So,S is closed since S S. Since0, 0 S, and<br />

B0, 0, r is not contained in S for any r 0, S is not open.<br />

3.4 Prove that every nonempty open set S in R 1 contains both rational and irratonal<br />

numbers.<br />

proof: Given a nonempty open set S in R 1 .Letx S, then there exists r 0 such that<br />

Bx, r S since S is open. <strong>And</strong> in R 1 , the open ball Bx, r x r, x r. Since any<br />

interval contains both rational and irrational numbers, we have S contains both rational and<br />

irrational numbers.<br />

3.5 Prove that the only set in R 1 which are both open and closed are the empty set<br />

and R 1 itself. Is a similar statement true for R 2 <br />

Proof: Let S be the set in R 1 , and thus consider its complement T R 1 S. <strong>The</strong>n we<br />

have both S and T are open and closed. Suppose that S R 1 and S , we will show that<br />

it is impossible as follows.<br />

Since S R 1 ,andS , then T and T R 1 . Choose s 0 S and t 0 T, then we<br />

consider the new point s 0t 0<br />

which is in S or T since R S T. If s 0t 0<br />

S, wesay<br />

2 2<br />

s 0 t 0<br />

s<br />

2 1, otherwise, we say s 0t 0<br />

t<br />

2 1.<br />

Continue these steps, we finally have two sequences named s n S and t m T.<br />

In addition, the two sequences are convergent to the same point, say p by our construction.<br />

So, we get p S and p T since both S and T are closed.<br />

However, it leads us to get a contradiction since p S T . Hence S R 1 or<br />

S .<br />

Remark: 1. In the proof, the statement is true for R n .<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> construction is not strange for us since the process is called Bolzano Process.<br />

3. 6 Prove that every closed set in R 1 is the intersection of a countable collection of<br />

open sets.<br />

proof: Given a closed set S, and consider its complement R 1 S which is open. If<br />

R 1 S , there is nothing to prove. So, we can assume that R 1 S .<br />

Let x R 1 S, then x is an interior point of R 1 S. So, there exists an open interval<br />

a, b such that x a, b R 1 S. In order to show our statement, we choose a smaller<br />

interval a x , b x so that x a x , b x and a x , b x a, b R 1 S. Hence, we have<br />

R 1 S xR 1 S a x , b x <br />

which implies that<br />

S R 1 xR 1 S a x , b x <br />

xR 1 S R 1 a x , b x <br />

n n1 R 1 a n , b n (by Lindelof Convering <strong>The</strong>orem).<br />

Remark: 1. <strong>The</strong>re exists another proof by Representation <strong>The</strong>orem for Open Sets on<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Real</strong> Line.<br />

2. Note that it is true for that every closed set in R 1 is the intersection of a countable<br />

collection of closed sets.<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> proof is suitable for R n if the statement is that every closed set in R n is the<br />

intersection of a countable collection of open sets. All we need is to change intervals into<br />

disks.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!