Cost benefit analysis of peri-urban land use policy - Plurel

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Data Biodiversity zone The primary purpose of this zone is to enable the long-term protection and enhancement of the remnant Mosslands which are designated for their biodiversity value. It is proposed that the land between the existing sites is used to create a mosaic of wildlife habitats that integrate ‘nature conservation’ and ‘classroom’ functions by providing limited/managed access for passive recreation and educational purposes. We consider inland wetlands as the primary land type of this zone, which have the vegetation of lowland raised bog, fens, wet woodlands and reed beds. The types of wetlands that have the aforementioned vegetation can be peatlands (forested and non-forested), river floodplain, shrub-dominated wetlands, etc. We establish a conducted a review of studies that contained estimates of the economic benefits of the ecosystem services of wetlands in temperate region, and the details of these studies are exhibited in Table 10. We then convert the original estimates in national currency into values in 2008 British Pounds, by applying PPP exchange rates (if in currencies other than British Pound) and/or the Consumer Price Index. Note that for the sake of consistency, this study considers the studies that have unit estimates of hectare, i.e. £/ha. The collected data shows that the estimated benefits of wetlands in temperate regions range between £747 and £21725/ha/year. Our best guess value is £8201/ha/year, drawing on the study by EFTEC for the UK. The service values considered in these estimates include non-use preservation value, recreational value, hydrological value and ecological value. Page 34 • PLUREL report No 4.4.3 • December 2010
Table 10: Valuation data for wetland zone Study Original value/ha/year Base year Type of wetlands Method Location Costanza et al. (1997) 9990 US$/ha/year 1994US$ Tidal marsh/mangroves The sum of consumer and producer surplus; the net rent (the producer Global 19580 US$/ha/year Swamps/floodplain surplus); price times quantity Kirkland (1988) Woodward and Wui (2001) 956.24 US$/ha/year (aggregate) 3757 US$/ha (aggregate) 2003 US$ Peat bog and swamp Contingent valuation New Zealand 1990US$ All kinds of wetlands Meta-analysis Worldwide David Suzuki Foundation (2008) Costanza, Wilson, Troy, Voinov, Liu and D’Agostino (2006) Economics for the Environment Consultancy and Entec (2002) $14194/ha/yr Bog $14248/ha/yr 2005 Marsh Ontario, Various types of methods $14138/ha/yr CAN$ Swamps Canada $15069/ha/yr Fens $21477 – New Jersey, 2004 US$ Freshwater wetlands Value transfer 28573/ha/year USA £6616/ha/year 2001£ Wetlands Benefit transfer UK Page 35 • PLUREL report No 4.4.3 • December 2010
Page 1 and 2: Sustainability Impact Assessment Mo
Page 3 and 4: Cost benefit analysis of transport
Page 5 and 6: Classification of results/outputs:
Page 7 and 8: Introduction The valuation of the p
Page 9 and 10: Golf Course Development in the Peri
Page 11 and 12: Costs and benefits A scoping of pot
Page 13 and 14: Compensation costs to the conversio
Page 15 and 16: We applied the marginal value estim
Page 17 and 18: Table 5: Development costs of golf
Page 19 and 20: The average house price in the poli
Page 21 and 22: Tourism Koper is located in the reg
Page 23 and 24: Results Taking the figures for the
Page 25 and 26: Navrud, S. and R. Ready(2002) Valui
Page 27 and 28: The Mosslands visioning project The
Page 29 and 30: Figure 2: Land Use Plan with Maximu
Page 31 and 32: Table 8: Specifications of each zon
Page 33: ⎛ Pop ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ T1 GDPT 1 V =
Page 37 and 38: Table 11:Values for Hydrological Zo
Page 39 and 40: Agricultural zone Land use within t
Page 41 and 42: Table 12: Current Data on Agricultu
Page 43 and 44: Table 14: Gross margin (in 2008£)
Page 45 and 46: details are exhibited in Page 45
Page 47 and 48: Table 16: Profitability of horticul
Page 49 and 50: Public enjoyment and access zone Th
Page 51 and 52: Results and discussion Table 19 exh
Page 53 and 54: Figure 3:Net Benefits of Maximum We
Page 55 and 56: The use of the combining of socioec
Page 57 and 58: Economics for the Environment Consu
Page 59 and 60: Cost Benefit Analysis of Transport
Page 61 and 62: In relation with differing sustaina
Page 63 and 64: The MOLAND Model The MOLAND Model i
Page 65 and 66: Figure 1. Growth Paths and Spatial
Page 67 and 68: Scenarios for the GDA Within the fr
Page 69 and 70: Figure 3. Transport 21 Network Used
Page 71 and 72: towns (see Figure 6). In other word
Page 73 and 74: operation costs, travel time, accid
Page 75 and 76: Capital Cost Estimation of Rapid Ra
Page 77 and 78: Valuation of Traffic Safety It can
Page 79 and 80: Railway costs can be analysed as fi
Page 81 and 82: Table 6. Average Earnings-Wage, Sal
Page 83 and 84: value and discounted at a standard
Page 86 and 87:
Table 9. Summary of Sensitivity Tes
Page 88 and 89:
Source: Lavalle et.al. (2009) The c
Page 90 and 91:
DKM Ltd. Economic Consultants. (199
Page 92 and 93:
Orsini, F. and Williams, B. (2009)
Page 94 and 95:
Applying Economic Valuation to Peri
Page 96 and 97:
Table 1: Marginal damage costs of C
Page 98 and 99:
Results GDP For the Leipzig-Halle c
Page 100 and 101:
Open space Open space in Leipzig wa
Page 102 and 103:
Discussion In this report, we have
Page 104:
Annex 1: Calculation of Amenity Los
show all

Cost benefit analysis of peri-urban land use policy - Plurel

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?