Cost benefit analysis of peri-urban land use policy - Plurel

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 16. More work needs to be done to investigate the types of vegetable cropping that would be plausible for the project area, but this is beyond the scope of this study. Page 46 • PLUREL report No 4.4.3 • December 2010
Table 16: Profitability of horticulture activities by types of vegetables in the UK 2004-2008 average production (2008£/ha/year) Gross margin rate (2005-2008 average, %) Gross margin (2008£/ha/ye ar) Asparagus 8,453 58.6 - 64.6 4,953 - 5,461 Beans, green 1,474 58.6 - 64.6 864 - 952 Cabbages and other brassicas 9,082 58.6 - 64.6 5,322 - 5,867 Carrots and turnips 20,140 58.6 - 64.6 11,802 - 13,010 Cauliflowers and broccoli 4,762 58.6 - 64.6 2,791 - 3,076 Chillies and peppers, green 206,974 58.6 - 64.6 121,287 - 133,705 Cucumbers and gherkins 302,710 58.6 - 64.6 177,388 - 195,550 Leeks, other alliaceous veg 20,917 58.6 - 64.6 12,257 - 13,512 Lettuce and chicory 8,491 58.6 - 64.6 4,976 - 5,485 Onions (inc. shallots), green 12,953 58.6 - 64.6 7,590 - 8,368 Onions, dry 7,657 58.6 - 64.6 4,487 - 4,946 Peas, green 10,505 58.6 - 64.6 6,156 - 6,786 Tomatoes 330,961 58.6 - 64.6 193,943 - 213,801 Source: Authors’ own calculations, based on data from FAOSTAT and Farm Business Survey 2006/2007, 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 The importance of considering external costs of agriculture activities has also been recognised in literature and such external costs include the pollution impact of fertilisers and pesticides on soils, water air and human health in the long term. These external costs are taken as negative economic benefits of this area by adopting the estimated average external costs of agricultural activities in the UK at £229/ha/year (1996£), available in Pretty et al. (2000). It is worth nothing that this estimation refers to a national average estimation and the actual external costs specific to the project area can vary with respect to the types of agriculture activities. The non-provisioning benefits of agricultural lands in the UK were estimated at £103/ha/year (2001£) for intensive agriculture, considering only landscape value Economics for the Environment Consultancy and Entec (2002). Page 47 • PLUREL report No 4.4.3 • December 2010
Page 1 and 2: Sustainability Impact Assessment Mo
Page 3 and 4: Cost benefit analysis of transport
Page 5 and 6: Classification of results/outputs:
Page 7 and 8: Introduction The valuation of the p
Page 9 and 10: Golf Course Development in the Peri
Page 11 and 12: Costs and benefits A scoping of pot
Page 13 and 14: Compensation costs to the conversio
Page 15 and 16: We applied the marginal value estim
Page 17 and 18: Table 5: Development costs of golf
Page 19 and 20: The average house price in the poli
Page 21 and 22: Tourism Koper is located in the reg
Page 23 and 24: Results Taking the figures for the
Page 25 and 26: Navrud, S. and R. Ready(2002) Valui
Page 27 and 28: The Mosslands visioning project The
Page 29 and 30: Figure 2: Land Use Plan with Maximu
Page 31 and 32: Table 8: Specifications of each zon
Page 33 and 34: ⎛ Pop ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ T1 GDPT 1 V =
Page 35 and 36: Table 10: Valuation data for wetlan
Page 37 and 38: Table 11:Values for Hydrological Zo
Page 39 and 40: Agricultural zone Land use within t
Page 41 and 42: Table 12: Current Data on Agricultu
Page 43 and 44: Table 14: Gross margin (in 2008£)
Page 45: details are exhibited in Page 45
Page 49 and 50: Public enjoyment and access zone Th
Page 51 and 52: Results and discussion Table 19 exh
Page 53 and 54: Figure 3:Net Benefits of Maximum We
Page 55 and 56: The use of the combining of socioec
Page 57 and 58: Economics for the Environment Consu
Page 59 and 60: Cost Benefit Analysis of Transport
Page 61 and 62: In relation with differing sustaina
Page 63 and 64: The MOLAND Model The MOLAND Model i
Page 65 and 66: Figure 1. Growth Paths and Spatial
Page 67 and 68: Scenarios for the GDA Within the fr
Page 69 and 70: Figure 3. Transport 21 Network Used
Page 71 and 72: towns (see Figure 6). In other word
Page 73 and 74: operation costs, travel time, accid
Page 75 and 76: Capital Cost Estimation of Rapid Ra
Page 77 and 78: Valuation of Traffic Safety It can
Page 79 and 80: Railway costs can be analysed as fi
Page 81 and 82: Table 6. Average Earnings-Wage, Sal
Page 83 and 84: value and discounted at a standard
Page 86 and 87: Table 9. Summary of Sensitivity Tes
Page 88 and 89: Source: Lavalle et.al. (2009) The c
Page 90 and 91: DKM Ltd. Economic Consultants. (199
Page 92 and 93: Orsini, F. and Williams, B. (2009)
Page 94 and 95: Applying Economic Valuation to Peri
Page 96 and 97:
Table 1: Marginal damage costs of C
Page 98 and 99:
Results GDP For the Leipzig-Halle c
Page 100 and 101:
Open space Open space in Leipzig wa
Page 102 and 103:
Discussion In this report, we have
Page 104:
Annex 1: Calculation of Amenity Los
show all

Cost benefit analysis of peri-urban land use policy - Plurel

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?