Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Other SON-related aspects that were discussed in the framework of Rel-9 included a new OAM interface<br />
to control home eNodeB, and studies on self-testing and self-healing functions. SON-related functionality<br />
continues to expand through the subsequent releases of the LTE standard.<br />
The SON specifications are built over the existing 3GPP network management architecture, reusing much<br />
functionality that existed prior to Rel-8. These management interfaces are being defined in a generic<br />
manner to leave room for innovation on different vendor implementations. OAM plays a key role in the<br />
application of the SON algorithms to network deployments. Targets for the various SON functions are set<br />
by the OAM, such as the number of handover events and failures, additional PM counts, KPIs, etc. The<br />
OAM also controls the enabling/disabling of SON function in addition to setting trigger conditions for<br />
optimization function and setting specific policies. Taken together, the OAM and the SON algorithms<br />
together allow operators to cost effectively deploy LTE networks on a wide scale.<br />
More information on the SON capabilities in 3GPP can be found in 3G <strong>Americas</strong>’ December 2009 white<br />
paper, The Benefits of SON in LTE. 147<br />
B.2.7 ENHANCED DOWNLINK BEAMFORMING (DUAL‐LAYER)<br />
In LTE Rel-8, five types of multi-antenna schemes are supported on the downlink. This includes transmit<br />
diversity, open-loop and closed-loop SM, MU-MIMO, and single layer UE-specific reference symbolbased<br />
Beamforming. In UE-specific reference symbol-based BF (also referred to as Mode-7) the eNodeB<br />
can semi-statically configure a UE to use the UE-specific reference signal as a phase reference for data<br />
demodulation of a single codeword at the UE. At the eNodeB transmitter, a set of transmit weights are<br />
computed and applied to each sub-carrier within a desired band to both the data and the corresponding<br />
dedicated reference symbol described in 3GPP TS36.211 Section 6.10.3. The simplest way to compute<br />
the transmit antenna weights is to first compute a covariance matrix of the channel over the band of<br />
interest and then taking the largest eigenvector of this covariance matrix, and applying it to all the subcarriers<br />
within the band. For TDD transmission, the covariance matrix can be computed from Sounding<br />
Reference Signal (SRS) due to reciprocity while for FDD the translation of UL covariance to <strong>DL</strong><br />
covariance may be possible for some cases or a codebook feedback can be used.<br />
To enhance the performance of Mode-7, dual-layer BF has been standardized in LTE Rel-9. In this new<br />
mode (Mode-8), the presence of two layers of UE-specific reference signals enables an eNodeB<br />
scheduler to schedule a <strong>DL</strong> transmission using Single-User MIMO (SU-MIMO) – rank-1 or 2 – or MU-<br />
MIMO – based on covariance matrices and CQI information feedback from UEs. The estimate of the<br />
covariance matrix at the eNodeB may be obtained using channel reciprocity from SRS in an LTE TDD<br />
system.<br />
The existing semi-static MU-MIMO scheme in Rel-8 uses a 4 bit codebook feedback (for 4 transmit<br />
antennas) where the codebook is a subset of the SU-MIMO codebook. There is only 1 layer of UEspecific<br />
reference signals and the UE cannot suppress the cross-talk due to MU-MIMO. The performance<br />
of standalone Rel-8 MU-MIMO is inferior to Rel-8 SU-MIMO (Mode-4) or UE-specific RS-based BF<br />
(Mode-7).<br />
In LTE Rel-9, two orthogonal streams of UE-specific reference signals (RS) are supported as shown in<br />
Figure B. for MU-MIMO transmission in the new transmission mode. The two orthogonal streams of UEspecific<br />
RS are CDMed, have the same overhead as Rel-8 one stream UE-specific RS, and allows for<br />
147 The Benefits of SON in LTE, 3G <strong>Americas</strong>, December 2009.<br />
www.4gamericas.org February 2011 Page 136