Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
cross-talk suppression. The downlink control signaling does not indicate the presence of co-scheduled<br />
UEs.<br />
Figure B.10. UE-Specific Reference Signal Structure per Resource Block (RB).<br />
For Rel-9 dual layer BF, the UE may feedback CQI back based on transmit diversity computed from the<br />
common reference signals (CRS) and may not feedback a rank indicator. The transmit weights, MCS and<br />
rank are computed at the eNodeB in this transmission mode. The UE is not aware of SU or MU-MIMO<br />
transmission during decoding of PDSCH. The transmit weights (for both PDSCH and UE-specific<br />
demodulation RS) are determined at the eNodeB based on covariance computed from either, SRS (for<br />
TDD) or a long-term estimate of UL covariance (FDD).<br />
B.2.8 VOCODER RATE ADAPTATION FOR LTE<br />
The vocoder rate adaptation mechanism allows operators to be able to control the codec rate based on<br />
load criteria. At peak hour there could be a desire to trade off some quality for additional capacity. The<br />
purpose of this mechanism is to provide support to enable vocoder rate change in LTE networks, in<br />
particular to let the UE select a more appropriate and radio resource friendly AMR encoder for VoIP.<br />
Vocoder rate adaptation has also been extended to cover HSPA in Rel-10.<br />
The vocoder rate adaptation mechanism relies on existing end-to-end schemes for Codec Rate<br />
Adaptation (3GPP TS 26.114) to dynamically adapt an individual real-time media component to changing<br />
conditions in the network. Those schemes are based on measurements performed on the receiving side<br />
(e.g., packet loss, packet delay) that are reported back to the sending side via RTCP receiver reports. In<br />
addition, the receiving side can use RTCP to explicitly control, for example, the codec rate, at the sending<br />
side.<br />
The key element of the vocoder rate adaptation mechanism is the adoption of the IP based Explicit<br />
Congestion Notification (ECN) specified in [RFC3168]. The eNodeB can use ECN as an “early prewarning”<br />
mechanism, (i.e. first set the “Congestion Experienced” (ECN-CE) codepoint in IP packets at<br />
incipient congestion) and only start the dropping of packets on a bearer when congestion persists and/or<br />
increases. The ECN-CE codepoint in an IP packet indicates congestion in the direction in which the IP<br />
packets are being sent. The ECN-CE signal propagates to the receiving IP end-point and is made<br />
available to the media/application layer receiver. The receiver can then send an application layer rate<br />
reduction message (e.g., RTCP) to request a new send rate from the corresponding sender. Thereby, the<br />
media/application layer should typically have sufficient reaction time (i.e. trigger a rate reduction before<br />
packets need to be dropped at the bottleneck).<br />
The basic mechanism is shown in Figures B.11 and B.12 for downlink and uplink, respectively.<br />
www.4gamericas.org February 2011 Page 137