12.11.2012 Views

DL - 4G Americas

DL - 4G Americas

DL - 4G Americas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.3.3 FIXED MOBILE CONVERGENCE ENHANCEMENTS<br />

The Fixed Mobile Convergence (FMC) scenario in 3GPP is part of the Evolved Packet System defined by<br />

3GPP TS 23.402 where it is specified how a non-3GPP system can be connected to a 3GPP EPC<br />

network. The interconnection of a non-3GPP system is based on two scenarios depending on whether<br />

the non-3GPP network is considered a Trusted access network or an Untrusted access network. In 3GPP<br />

specifications, the non-3GPP system can be any technology which is not defined by 3GPP, such as<br />

WLAN, WiMAX, 3GPP2 and xDSL. However in some cases, the access characteristics are taken into<br />

account, while in other cases it is assumed that access network will support some 3GPP specific features.<br />

A simple example is represented by APN and PCO. 3GPP assumes that if supported then the UE has the<br />

same behavior in 3GPP access and in non-3GPP access, otherwise the UE cannot establish a PDN<br />

connection from non-3GPP system, so the user cannot obtain the same services from both networks.<br />

For its nature, the FMC spans several standard organizations. The 3GPP and Broadband Forum (BBF)<br />

started a collaboration and a parallel work for definition of use cases, requirements, architecture and<br />

protocol considering new 3GPP features such as H(e)NBs; Local Internet Protocol Access (LIPA) to<br />

residential/corporate local networks; Selected IP traffic offload (SIPTO) for H(e)NBs; IP Flow Mobility and<br />

seamless WLAN offload (IFOM); and new BBF features as support of IP session, definition of Policy<br />

Framework and Broadband multi-service nodes.<br />

Considering the complexity of the scenario, the work in 3GPP has been divided in three steps: the first<br />

step considers the scenario of a 3GPP UE or a femto connected to the BBF access where the traffic is<br />

always home routed; the second step considers the scenario of traffic offloaded to the broadband access,<br />

(i.e. SIPTO/LIPA and non-seamless WLAN offload); the third scenario considers a more tight convergent<br />

network. The first two steps are commonly identified as interworking scenario. The above work has been<br />

further organized in as a study included in the 3GPP TR 23.839, after the conclusion of each step the<br />

normative specification will be modified accordingly.<br />

The BBF has organized the parallel Fixed Mobile Convergence (FMC) work differently. The 3GPP<br />

interworking use cases and requirements are defined in WT-203; however, some impact is expected on<br />

the WT-134, which defines the use cases, requirements and the information model for the Broadband<br />

Policy Control Framework.<br />

The interworking scenario takes into account the Trusted/Untrusted model and the different mobility<br />

protocols (e.g. DSMIPv6 on s2c, PMIPv6 on s2b, etc) defined in 3GPP TS 23.402, where the generic<br />

non-3GPP access network has been substituted by the BBF access network with its own characteristic.<br />

Figure 7.12 shows the reference architecture for Untrusted scenario with s2c and s2b (for the other<br />

scenario refers to 3GPP TS 23.839 or to WT-203). The key interfaces are the S9* between the PCRF and<br />

the BBF Policy Server and the STa*/Swa between the AAA Servers. The S9* interface represents the<br />

enhancement of 3GPP S9 for supporting the transport of the QoS and Charging information between the<br />

Broadband Policy Framework and the PCC. At current stage of work, BBF and 3GPP agreed that PCRF<br />

sends the 3GPP QoS rules to the BBF Policy Server which performs the mapping to BBF QoS rules.<br />

However, since the BBF is defining the Policy Information Model and the functionalities of the Policy<br />

Framework, many open issues are on the table and further work is required. For example, one of the<br />

main issues is related to the 3GPP UE authentication. The 3GPP specification requires that UE<br />

authentication is EAP-based, but the BBF specification does not support EAP-based authentication for a<br />

single device beyond the Residential Gateway (RG). In order to fulfill such requirement and to enable also<br />

the device authentication for fixed device, BBF has started the definition of the support of EAP for IP<br />

session in WT-146. So, if the 3GPP UE is authenticated when attached to a WLAN both BBF access and<br />

3GPP are aware of the UE identity and the Policy server can start the S9 session towards the PCRF. If<br />

www.4gamericas.org February 2011 Page 69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!