20.01.2015 Views

publication

publication

publication

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

People<br />

www.tradersonline-mag.com 04.2014<br />

F2) Noise Ranking of Asian Markets 2005-2010<br />

Kaufman: That would seem easy to<br />

answer: “Because it’s not making<br />

money!” but actually, that’s a<br />

difficult question. Theoretically, we<br />

design a trading program to have a<br />

specific level of risk, measured by<br />

the annualized volatility of returns.<br />

For the futures industry, that’s about<br />

14 per cent, equal to one standard<br />

deviation. So there is a 16 per cent<br />

chance (the left tail) that we’ll see a<br />

loss of more than 14 per cent during<br />

one year. It’s also possible that we<br />

could see a loss twice as large. The<br />

real problem is deciding if that’s<br />

a “normal” loss or whether the<br />

program is no longer working. To<br />

This figure shows several Asian markets sorted for their noise levels. The more mature markets (Japan and find that out, you need to dig deeper<br />

Hong Kong), are the noisiest while the less traded ones (Sri Lanka and Vietnam), are the trendiest.<br />

into the frequency of losses, the<br />

Source: www.kaufmansignals.com<br />

duration, and other statistics. I lean<br />

towards frequency of losses to tell<br />

me that something is wrong. In the<br />

if you’re really smart, you will be the first to find another end you could say “It still could be normal,” but I favour<br />

new way of trading, like high-frequency trading, but that deleveraging when I’m uncertain about the program,<br />

doesn’t happen often.<br />

or when we reach a 1.5 standard deviation loss. In that<br />

sense we manage the “business risk,” that is, both the<br />

TRADERS´: How do you recognise a system you’re using is investor and I want to stay in business. I will give up some<br />

not working profitably anymore<br />

potential profits until I either decide that the program is<br />

fine, or it continues to deteriorate. By<br />

the way, the solution to that problem<br />

F3) Information Ratio, Sorted Highest to Lowest, All Futures from 1990<br />

is still the most elusive.<br />

TRADERS´: In the way markets function,<br />

do you see any consistent edges for<br />

retail traders over the big guys<br />

Kaufman: Yes, retail traders are<br />

more flexible because they can get<br />

in and out of the market without<br />

anyone noticing. They can trade<br />

equal risk in stocks because their<br />

positions are small. The big traders<br />

can’t even trade some opportunities<br />

because they would move the<br />

market too much with the position<br />

size they need.<br />

The U.S. and European index markets are the noisiest. So you want to favour mean reversion systems for<br />

those markets on the right of the chart, and trend systems for those on the left.<br />

Source: www.kaufmansignals.com<br />

TRADERS´: You were already using<br />

moving averages in the 1970s. Many<br />

traders use these concepts today. Do<br />

you still see value in such methods<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!