Download PDF (2.5MB) - Anchor Environmental
Download PDF (2.5MB) - Anchor Environmental
Download PDF (2.5MB) - Anchor Environmental
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2. STUDY APPROACH AND METHODS<br />
2.1 Overall approach<br />
This study was based on an international literature review of boat-based whale watching, interviews<br />
with major stakeholders in the boat-based whale watching industry in South Africa, and logbook data<br />
submitted by boat-based whale watching permit holders to MCM as part of their permit requirements.<br />
Information on resource quality was also taken into consideration.<br />
2.2 Consultation with management authorities and industry<br />
The study began with a meeting the client (MCM) in Cape Town in November 2004, to discuss the<br />
characteristics of the industry and to identify key areas for focus that would result in relevant outputs<br />
according to their management and policy needs. MCM supplied data on permit-holder details.<br />
During client meetings and subsequent research, the researchers were made aware of the existence<br />
of the South African Boat-based Whale Watching Association (SABBWWA). After initial contact<br />
,concern was expressed by SABBWA that the study had been commissioned and the questionnaire<br />
had been developed without their knowledge or input. The study was delayed for a period until<br />
SABBWWA had given their inputs and were happy for the survey process to resume. Meetings were<br />
held between the project leaders and members of SABBWWA in Knysna in December 2004 and with<br />
the chairman in Cape Town in January 2005. An MCM representative was also present at the latter<br />
meeting. During these meetings, the perceptions and concerns of SABBWWA relating to the industry<br />
were discussed. This provided an important alternative and independent assessment of the current<br />
management and industry characteristics to that provided by the management authority.<br />
2.3 Review<br />
The first part of the study was to conduct a review of boat-based whale watching. This included a<br />
search for information on the boat-based whale watching industry in South Africa. The main output of<br />
this task was a review of the whale watching industry internationally, in order to set the South African<br />
industry within a larger context, in terms of the quality of resources, demand for whale watching and<br />
its economic value, as well as the way in which boat-based whale watching is managed<br />
internationally. The review also served to set a framework for understanding the industry and its<br />
potential for growth through a review of its establishment and growth in South Africa, the existence of<br />
supporting and enabling frameworks and a description of the existing patterns of management and<br />
control of the resources.<br />
2.4 Questionnaire surveys and data collection<br />
Following this, questionnaire instruments were developed for surveying permit-holders and nonpermitted<br />
operators. Clients could not be surveyed because the study had to be conducted out of<br />
whale watching season. The permit-holder questionnaire sought to acquire information on the nature<br />
of the businesses involved and services provided, limitations, levels of occupancy and capital and<br />
operating costs associated with whale watching (Box 2.1). It also elicited the operators’ perceptions<br />
of future trends in the industry and of management. Non-permitted operators interviewed included<br />
marine tour operators that illegally conducted boat-based whale watching tours to varying extents,<br />
and some that did not, but that could potentially. In addition to marine tour operators, interviews were<br />
also conducted with hotel owners in the Border-Kei area and on the Wild Coast.<br />
In total, 17 of the 18 existing permit holders granted the researchers time for interviews. Permit<br />
holders were identified through contact details and related information provided by MCM and<br />
SABBWWA. These interviews were conducted between December 2004 and March 2005, outside<br />
2