Download PDF (2.5MB) - Anchor Environmental
Download PDF (2.5MB) - Anchor Environmental
Download PDF (2.5MB) - Anchor Environmental
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Turnover (R millions)<br />
4.50<br />
4.00<br />
3.50<br />
3.00<br />
2.50<br />
2.00<br />
1.50<br />
1.00<br />
0.50<br />
0.00<br />
R 2 = 0.75<br />
0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000<br />
Amount spent on marketing (R)<br />
Figure 5.16. Relationship between investment in boat-based whale watching-related marketing and turnover<br />
Demand for boat-based whale watching in any one area, and overall, is thus probably heavily<br />
dependent on marketing, especially considering the large number of alternative destinations in South<br />
Africa and particularly at a global scale. Demand was described as being in excess of business<br />
capacity by five operators, along the Agulhas Coast, the Garden Route and in KwaZulu-Natal. Other<br />
operators in nearby areas described low or medium demand. High demand was not necessarily<br />
associated with large urban centres where a huge potential market exists. There was wide variability<br />
of success among permit holders in the Western Cape, currently the recognised “hotspot” for whale<br />
watching in South Africa. This indicates that fine scale demand at specific towns or centres is highly<br />
variable though demand is generally considered higher than in the Eastern Cape or KwaZulu-Natal.<br />
Of course the level of expenditure on marketing, and probably also the general level of service<br />
provided, is also a function of the degree to which a business is already established or is supported<br />
by associated businesses.<br />
In terms of the business models, the most successful were general and marine tour operators,<br />
especially those that benefited from close relationships with complementary businesses such as<br />
accommodation establishments. There was mixed success among marine tour operations that were<br />
closely interlinked (model 4), but this is possibly to some extent an artefact of the difficulty in ascribing<br />
shared costs to the different businesses. All but one of the operators that concentrated solely on<br />
boat-based whale watching had low profits or made a loss. Operations relying on other parties for<br />
boats seemed fraught with problems such as difficulties in achieving regular access to suitable boats.<br />
An interview with one of the boat owners involved revealed that the operation concerned was not<br />
yielding enough income to make the use of his boat worthwhile. Two such permit holders in the<br />
Western Cape have ceased operations, although they have indicated they do have plans to improve<br />
the level of activity through the acquisition of new boats and infrastructure. Thus, while the business<br />
model appears to be important, it is important to realise that good business sense is probably even<br />
more important.<br />
Boat size appeared to have some influence. High profits were generally recorded for operations with<br />
medium-sized boats (16 – 30 passengers), and low to medium for large boats. Smaller boats were<br />
associated with a wide range of profit levels.<br />
Another factor that may influence the success of existing operators is the level of competition, both in<br />
terms of other areas (e.g. when dedicated whale watchers choose their destination), and locally, from<br />
‘rogue’ (non-permitted) operators. There is no obvious impact on turnover or profits in areas where<br />
numbers of rogue operators are high. However, this trend would be masked to some extent by the<br />
fact that rogue operators are more likely to occur in areas where a combination of factors would make<br />
boat-based whale watching successful. Nevertheless, rogue operators are virtually non-existent<br />
along the Agulhas Coast, where conditions are particularly attractive, and were reported to have a low<br />
30