21.01.2015 Views

Download PDF (2.5MB) - Anchor Environmental

Download PDF (2.5MB) - Anchor Environmental

Download PDF (2.5MB) - Anchor Environmental

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8. CONCLUSIONS AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

8.1 Introduction<br />

South Africa is one of the finest whale watching destinations in the world, and boat-based whale<br />

watching clearly has enormous potential. The industry has already seen excellent growth in spite of<br />

initial problems in its management 3 . In order to capitalise on the full economic potential of the<br />

resource, management of the industry will need to address these problems and facilitate the<br />

sustainable development of boat-based whale watching, subject to its main mandate of protecting the<br />

resource. The opportunity for doing so is now, with the drafting of a new policy for boat-based whale<br />

watching, and the imminent conversion of the industry from an ‘experimental fishery’ to an activity with<br />

longer-term rights.<br />

As it stands, South Africa has among the strictest regulations for whale watching, although these are<br />

not well enforced. Within the current framework the country has the opportunity to market itself as<br />

offering a high quality, intimate whale watching experience which is not marred by congestion (due to<br />

oversized or too many boats) or a sense of harassing the animals (due to excessive competition).<br />

These are the kind of characteristics that could swing whale watchers to choosing this country above<br />

others, supported by the fact that the country already offers among the best quality whale watching in<br />

the world. Encouraging an elite industry means few permit-holders who each have virtual monopolies<br />

of the areas that they serve. On the one hand, the lack of competition will help to maximise the<br />

extraction of foreign consumers’ willingness to pay, leaving little foreign consumers’ surplus, which is<br />

a sound strategy for a foreigner-dominated market. On the other hand, extra effort will be required to<br />

ensure that standards are maintained, in the absence of close competition.<br />

8.2 Numbers of permits<br />

This study suggests that the number of permits (= boats) could be increased by at least 20% based<br />

on existing demand relative to supply, and possibly up to 40% in the near future, based on the quality<br />

of resources and existing, untapped markets. These estimates do not take potential impacts on<br />

whales into account. These are cautious estimates, nevertheless, since demand is influenced to a<br />

great degree by marketing of the resource and the country in general, and future marketing efforts are<br />

an unknown. Strong marketing, combined with existing growth in tourism, will undoubtedly lead to<br />

considerable growth in demand. From a marketing perspective it would make sense to market<br />

different regions of the country differently, perhaps in conjunction with existing marketing drives. For<br />

example, the West Coast for its endemism and traditional charm, the Cape Town to Port Elizabeth<br />

coast for its extraordinary mix of marine diversity and high level of close-range cetacean activity, and<br />

the KwaZulu-Natal coast for its migrations – of both whales and fish. It is thus also envisaged that it<br />

would be an advantage to cluster permits in the most productive areas, and to create, to some extent,<br />

a critical mass of operators in different areas that would serve to increase the attractiveness of the<br />

areas to whale watching tourists. This could apply either to whales or to marine tours in general, and<br />

should be the subject of further investigation.<br />

There is some evidence that boat-based whale watching may have a harmful impact on the whale<br />

resource, and any increase in the numbers of permits should be vetted by appropriate cetacean<br />

specialists or subject to impact assessment studies before being offered. In general it would appear<br />

that having defined territories for each permit holder is crucial, as opposed to sharing areas. Thus the<br />

addition of permits may either involve the splitting of existing areas or the allocation of additional boat<br />

permits to existing operators. The latter is likely to provide better incentive for operators to look after<br />

the whale resources in their area, since excessive disturbance may result in lower encounter rates. A<br />

precautionary strategy would probably be to start by concentrating on maximising the value of existing<br />

permits, through improved management (especially policing) and allocation of the more viable existing<br />

permits that have not been taken up or are no longer being used. Thereafter, the possibilities for<br />

expansion are limited only by the resilience of the resource itself.<br />

3 See comments submitted by SABBWWA – Appendix 6.<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!