STATE OF NEVADA - Division of Child and Family Services
STATE OF NEVADA - Division of Child and Family Services
STATE OF NEVADA - Division of Child and Family Services
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
B. <strong>Child</strong>ren’s Justice Act Task Force (CJA): The CJA task force is composed <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals with knowledge <strong>and</strong><br />
experience related to the criminal justice system <strong>and</strong> issues <strong>of</strong> child physical abuse, child neglect, <strong>and</strong> child sexual<br />
abuse <strong>and</strong> exploitation, <strong>and</strong> child maltreatment related fatalities. The purpose <strong>and</strong> function <strong>of</strong> the CJA is to<br />
comprehensively:<br />
• Support, promote <strong>and</strong> initiate systematic change that will improve the investigation <strong>and</strong> prosecution <strong>of</strong> child abuse<br />
<strong>and</strong> neglect.<br />
• Review <strong>and</strong> evaluate Nevada's investigative, administrative, <strong>and</strong> both civil <strong>and</strong> criminal judicial h<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>of</strong> cases<br />
<strong>of</strong> child abuse <strong>and</strong> neglect, particularly <strong>of</strong> child sexual abuse <strong>and</strong> exploitation, as well as cases involving<br />
suspected child maltreatment related fatalities <strong>and</strong> cases involving a potential combination <strong>of</strong> jurisdictions, such<br />
as interstate, federal-state, <strong>and</strong> state-tribal;<br />
• Make policy <strong>and</strong> training recommendations in each <strong>of</strong> the following categories:<br />
• Experimental, model, <strong>and</strong> demonstration programs for testing innovative approaches <strong>and</strong>,<br />
• Reform <strong>of</strong> state laws, ordinances, regulations, protocols <strong>and</strong> procedures to provide comprehensive protection for<br />
children from abuse, particularly child sexual abuse <strong>and</strong> exploitation, while ensuring fairness to all affected<br />
persons.<br />
C. Citizen Review Panels (CRP): Nevada’s CRP’s have been a great asset to the State <strong>and</strong> the field <strong>of</strong> child protection<br />
due to their ongoing commitment <strong>and</strong> continued involvement in Quality Improvement (QI) <strong>and</strong> training activities that<br />
benefit the child welfare system. The Statewide CRP was established in 1999 per NRS 432B.396 <strong>and</strong> has federally<br />
m<strong>and</strong>ated responsibilities under Title I, Section 106, <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Child</strong> Abuse Prevention <strong>and</strong> Treatment Act (CAPTA). The<br />
Statewide CRP consists <strong>of</strong> representation from community-based organizations <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals with backgrounds<br />
related to child protective services (CPS), child advocacy, children’s mental health, <strong>and</strong> foster parents. In essence,<br />
the CRP’s work consists <strong>of</strong> the review <strong>of</strong> internal policies <strong>and</strong> procedures within the CPS system, accomplished<br />
mainly through individual CPS case reviews. In response to meeting the federal requirement for three CRP’s based<br />
on the Basic State Grant funding increase for Nevada, both the Northern <strong>and</strong> Southern Citizens Advisory Committees<br />
(CACs) were invited into the CRP process in 2006. Approval to join as a CRP was given by the Northern CAC in late<br />
2006 <strong>and</strong> by the Southern CAC in early 2007. During 2007 <strong>and</strong> 2008, the Statewide CRP members continued to<br />
serve as regular, external stakeholders in quarterly case reviews implemented as part <strong>of</strong> the DCFS Quality<br />
Improvement Framework. Statewide CRP recommendations for 2007 focus on CPS staff training <strong>and</strong> practices,<br />
improving the DCFS QI case review process <strong>and</strong> expansion into other areas <strong>of</strong> review such as differential response<br />
<strong>and</strong> differential response training. Northern CAC/CRP recommendations for 2008 focus on CPS caseworker unit<br />
restructuring, family involvement in the child welfare system, <strong>and</strong> differential response. Southern CAC/CRP<br />
recommendations for 2008 focus on increased funding for child welfare services, policy <strong>and</strong> procedure redesign, <strong>and</strong><br />
CPS caseworker training.<br />
D. Court Improvement Project (CIP): Nevada's CIP was formed to address changing roles <strong>of</strong> court oversight in child<br />
abuse <strong>and</strong> neglect cases brought on by federal guidelines <strong>and</strong> Nevada statutes <strong>and</strong> is supported with federal funding.<br />
CIP continues to work closely with DCFS <strong>and</strong> other stakeholders to plan <strong>and</strong> develop changes statewide that will<br />
significantly improve the h<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>of</strong> child welfare cases throughout the state. The monthly schedule <strong>of</strong> meetings<br />
between the Administrative Office <strong>of</strong> the Courts (AOC)/CIP <strong>and</strong> DCFS is ongoing. Issues requiring a collaborative<br />
approach are discussed <strong>and</strong> items <strong>of</strong> mutual concern are identified for strategic planning. In the last year, extensive<br />
child welfare training was made available <strong>and</strong> delivered to Judges <strong>and</strong> Attorneys statewide. In addition to trainings, a<br />
final draft <strong>of</strong> the bench book, a guide for the judiciary on child welfare proceedings has been completed <strong>and</strong> is<br />
currently under review by the judiciary, the Office <strong>of</strong> the Attorney General <strong>and</strong> the DCFS Eligibility Unit. DCFS <strong>and</strong><br />
CIP have had monthly meetings regarding a variety <strong>of</strong> child welfare topics <strong>and</strong> children assigned to youth parole <strong>and</strong><br />
have been exploring UNITY data reports that could be useful for judges during court proceedings. CIP also received<br />
a presentation by the Eligibility Unit <strong>and</strong> were provided with recommendations for language in court orders to<br />
maximize IVE funding opportunities.<br />
E. Mental Health Consortia: The 2001 Legislature, per NRS 433B.333 established a Mental Health Consortium in<br />
three jurisdictions: Clark County, Washoe County the Rural Counties, to encourage cross system referral, ongoing<br />
collaboration <strong>and</strong> accessibility to services. The functions <strong>of</strong> the Mental Health Consortia are to assess the need for<br />
behavioral health, mental health <strong>and</strong> substance abuse services for children <strong>and</strong> families in each jurisdiction; to<br />
determine how well the current system is meeting those needs, <strong>and</strong> to develop an annual plan on how the need can<br />
Nevada APSR – SFY 2010<br />
Page 105 <strong>of</strong> 108