25.01.2015 Views

MCDA Final Report Malawi - Standards and Trade Development ...

MCDA Final Report Malawi - Standards and Trade Development ...

MCDA Final Report Malawi - Standards and Trade Development ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Option<br />

Number<br />

Name<br />

Details<br />

15 Seed inspection <strong>and</strong> certification capacity Worldwide, seed testing is required in order to comply<br />

with international st<strong>and</strong>ards. These requirements have<br />

been codified by a SADC st<strong>and</strong>ard; the Harmonized Seed<br />

Security Project (HaSSP). Challenges for seed health<br />

testing in <strong>Malawi</strong> include inadequate facilities, lack of<br />

experienced analysts, limited knowledge of where to find<br />

reference materials when submitting seed health testing<br />

methods, <strong>and</strong> limited research in seed science <strong>and</strong> seed<br />

health testing. This option will develop internationallyrecognised<br />

seed testing <strong>and</strong> certification services in<br />

<strong>Malawi</strong>.<br />

16 Animal health controls for day old chick<br />

exports<br />

A <strong>Malawi</strong>an producer of day old chicks exports to a<br />

number of African countries. Consignments must be<br />

accompanied by an original veterinary import permit <strong>and</strong><br />

animal health certificate with additional declarations<br />

issued by the veterinary services of the exporting<br />

country. Capacity needs to be built in the DALD of the<br />

MoAFS in order to meet trading partner animal health<br />

requirements.<br />

Stage 3: Definition of decision criteria <strong>and</strong> weights<br />

In the second stage of the stakeholder workshop, respondents were asked to define an appropriate set<br />

of criteria to drive the priority-setting process <strong>and</strong> to assign weights to these. First, participants were<br />

presented with a series of potential decision criteria organised into four categories as set out in Table 5,<br />

<strong>and</strong> asked which (if any) should be excluded <strong>and</strong> whether any potentially important criteria were<br />

missing. Two additional decision criteria were selected, namely:<br />

<br />

<br />

Difficulty of implementation: The level of difficulty likely to be faced in implementing the option<br />

given current political priorities, economic constraints, need for realignment of administrative<br />

priorities within government, need for cooperation between the public <strong>and</strong> private sectors<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or with governments in trade partners, etc.<br />

<strong>Trade</strong> diversification: the degree to which the option leads to the diversification of exports<br />

whether across products <strong>and</strong>/or markets. This is a key priority of the Government of <strong>Malawi</strong>.<br />

To define the decision weights, the workshop participants were each asked to assign 100 points<br />

amongst the eight decision criteria. The scores of participants were then collated <strong>and</strong> an average<br />

weighting calculated. This average weighting was reported back to the workshop participants to identify<br />

any discrepancies. The final agreed weightings are reported in Table 5.<br />

Stage 4: Construction of information cards<br />

Having identified the choice set of SPS capacity-building options <strong>and</strong> the decision criteria <strong>and</strong> weights to<br />

be applied in the priority-setting exercise, this information was assembled into a series of information<br />

cards. The aim of these cards is not only to ensure consistency in the measurement of each decision<br />

Page | 18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!