MCDA Final Report Malawi - Standards and Trade Development ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

up-front investment is pesticide controls for pulses (US$1.5 million). Most options require up-front investment of US$100,000 or over, although some have very low costs of around US$10,000, for example compliance with SPS requirements for honey exports and compliance with SPS requirements for chilli sauce exports. The majority of the options have little or no on-going cost. The only exceptions are animal health controls for day old chicks exports (7.5% of the annual value of exports), animal health controls for fish exports (5.4% of the annual value of exports), and compliance with SPS requirements for honey exports (4.6% of the annual value of exports). Figure 3. Decision criteria measures scores for SPS capacity-building options – up-front investment (US$ million) Most options are judged to be somewhat difficult to implement. The main exceptions are mycotoxin testing capacity, compliance with SPS requirements for chilli sauce exports, compliance with SPS requirements for honey exports, pesticide controls for tea, and animal health controls for fish exports, which are judged to be easy to implement (Figure 5). These latter options require little in the way of coordination within the Malawian government, between the public and private sectors in Malawi, and/or between the Government of Malawi and other country governments. Page | 29
Figure 4. Decision criteria measures scores for SPS capacity-building options – on-going costs (%) Figure 5. Decision criteria measures scores for SPS capacity-building options - difficulty of implementation Page | 30
Page 1 and 2: MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY AND TRADE Usin
Page 3 and 4: 4.11. Compliance with hygiene requi
Page 5 and 6: RASFF SADC SME SPS STDF TAML TBT UP
Page 7 and 8: Using Multi Criteria Decision Analy
Page 9 and 10: Table 1. Existing reviews of SPS co
Page 11 and 12: Table 3. Malawian agri-food exports
Page 13 and 14: were presented with a series of car
Page 15 and 16: Genetically-modified organism (GMO)
Page 17 and 18: Option Number Name Details 4 Mycoto
Page 19 and 20: Option Number Name Details 15 Seed
Page 21 and 22: Table 6. Decision criteria measurem
Page 23 and 24: 4. Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS)
Page 25 and 26: participation/oversight of the Comp
Page 27 and 28: 4.9. Pesticide residue testing capa
Page 29: Development (OECD) 51 ; and 3) Inte
Page 33 and 34: Figure 7. Decision criteria measure
Page 35 and 36: Finally, Figures 11 and 12 report t
Page 37 and 38: Figure 12. Decision criteria measur
Page 39 and 40: Figure 14. Decision criteria scores
Page 47 and 48: To explore the impact of changing t
Page 49 and 50: Figure 32. Net flows for baseline m
Page 51 and 52: Given the robustness of the results
Page 53 and 54: Faulkner, L., Harrington, J., Levy,
Page 55 and 56: Appendix 2. Participants at Stakeho
Page 57 and 58: Appendix 4. Capacity-Building Optio
Page 59 and 60: Poverty impact +2 Impact on vulnera
Page 61 and 62: Table A3.4. Mycotoxin testing capac
Page 63 and 64: Poverty impact +1 Impact on vulnera
Page 65 and 66: Table A3.7.Pesticide controls for p
Page 67 and 68: Table A3.9.Pesticide controls for t
Page 69 and 70: Table A3.11. Animal health controls
Page 71 and 72: Social impacts Poverty impact +1 Sm
Page 73 and 74: Social impacts Poverty impact +2 Li
Page 75 and 76: Table A3.15. Seed inspection and ce
Page 77 and 78: Table A3.16. Animal health controls
Page 79 and 80: 21 Anonymous (2002). Volume 2, Chap
Page 81:
The eggs from which the day old chi
show all

MCDA Final Report Malawi - Standards and Trade Development ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?