MCDA Final Report Malawi - Standards and Trade Development ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table A3.5. Compliance with SPS requirements for honey exports Decision Criterion Value Details Confidence Cost Up-front investment US$16,620 Legislative changes, design of monitoring programme, completion of initial surveillance, and collection and analysis of samples. Training of local personnel in maintaining and operating the monitoring High programme. Cost estimates based on costs encountered for same investments by SNV in Ethiopia. On-going cost 4.6% Costs of collecting and analysing samples as part of the monitoring programme and transmitting the results to the High European Commission for approval estimated at US$30,400. Ease of implementation 2 Changes to legislation and standards will be needed, requiring coordinated action across government and with the private sector. Medium Trade impacts Change in absolute value of exports US$750,000 The main market in Europe would be for processing grade honey Zambia has annual exports of 500 tonnes, and this is taken as a realistic estimate Medium of what Malawi might achieve by 2017. Trade diversification +1 Will enable access to limited new markets – Malawian honey is mainly used in processing and so limited potential for consumer/higher-value Medium markets. Domestic agri-food impacts Agricultural/fisheries productivity 0 Small scale of exports that is predicted suggests minimal impact on agricultural productivity Medium Domestic public health 0 No impact. High Environmental protection +1 Could promote the preservation of biodiversity, although scale limited. High Page | 61
Poverty impact +1 Impact on vulnerable groups +1 Social impacts Honey production by small farmers, although scale of exports predicted to be limited Large role of women and small-scale producers, although scale of exports predicted to be limited. Medium High Page | 62
Page 1 and 2:
MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY AND TRADE Usin
Page 3 and 4:
4.11. Compliance with hygiene requi
Page 5 and 6:
RASFF SADC SME SPS STDF TAML TBT UP
Page 7 and 8:
Using Multi Criteria Decision Analy
Page 9 and 10:
Table 1. Existing reviews of SPS co
Page 11 and 12: Table 3. Malawian agri-food exports
Page 13 and 14: were presented with a series of car
Page 15 and 16: Genetically-modified organism (GMO)
Page 17 and 18: Option Number Name Details 4 Mycoto
Page 19 and 20: Option Number Name Details 15 Seed
Page 21 and 22: Table 6. Decision criteria measurem
Page 23 and 24: 4. Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS)
Page 25 and 26: participation/oversight of the Comp
Page 27 and 28: 4.9. Pesticide residue testing capa
Page 29 and 30: Development (OECD) 51 ; and 3) Inte
Page 31 and 32: Figure 4. Decision criteria measure
Page 33 and 34: Figure 7. Decision criteria measure
Page 35 and 36: Finally, Figures 11 and 12 report t
Page 37 and 38: Figure 12. Decision criteria measur
Page 39 and 40: Figure 14. Decision criteria scores
Page 47 and 48: To explore the impact of changing t
Page 49 and 50: Figure 32. Net flows for baseline m
Page 51 and 52: Given the robustness of the results
Page 53 and 54: Faulkner, L., Harrington, J., Levy,
Page 55 and 56: Appendix 2. Participants at Stakeho
Page 57 and 58: Appendix 4. Capacity-Building Optio
Page 59 and 60: Poverty impact +2 Impact on vulnera
Page 61: Table A3.4. Mycotoxin testing capac
Page 65 and 66: Table A3.7.Pesticide controls for p
Page 67 and 68: Table A3.9.Pesticide controls for t
Page 69 and 70: Table A3.11. Animal health controls
Page 71 and 72: Social impacts Poverty impact +1 Sm
Page 73 and 74: Social impacts Poverty impact +2 Li
Page 75 and 76: Table A3.15. Seed inspection and ce
Page 77 and 78: Table A3.16. Animal health controls
Page 79 and 80: 21 Anonymous (2002). Volume 2, Chap
Page 81: The eggs from which the day old chi
show all

MCDA Final Report Malawi - Standards and Trade Development ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?