nymtc regional freight plan - New York Metropolitan Transportation ...
nymtc regional freight plan - New York Metropolitan Transportation ...
nymtc regional freight plan - New York Metropolitan Transportation ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A Freight Plan for the NYMTC Region<br />
Other Impacts<br />
The development impacts of a large intermodal yard at Maspeth are addressed in<br />
Section 5.3.3 below related to the Cross Harbor rail tunnel. An initial small bulk-only yard<br />
could be accommodated on the existing Phelps Dodge site. The Harlem River Yard is<br />
located within the coastal zone and non-<strong>freight</strong> transportation interests are competing for<br />
the site. The 65 th Street yard is part of an existing and extensive former transportation hub<br />
that has retained limited transportation functions over the years. The Pilgrim site is<br />
isolated from surrounding residential areas with potentially excellent rail and highway<br />
access.<br />
The <strong>regional</strong> environmental impact of the four <strong>freight</strong> village projects would generally be<br />
positive, although increased local truck and rail activities could have some negative<br />
impact. The local economic impacts would be positive due to the development of new<br />
<strong>freight</strong> and industrial activity. Freight villages can contribute to <strong>regional</strong> connectivity in<br />
almost all corridors. The greatest physical barrier to creating <strong>freight</strong> villages is the lack of<br />
available land for new facilities. In addition, community attitudes toward the introduction<br />
of new industrial activities tend to be mixed. The projects involve the introduction of<br />
more modern intermodal technology to the region.<br />
Responsible Organizations/Action Plans<br />
1. NYSDOT, MTA, Amtrak, CSX, and PANYNJ – Assess potential development of<br />
Harlem River yard as an intermodal terminal.<br />
2. NYSDOT – Conduct the Pilgrim EIS.<br />
3. NYCEDC – Complete Cross Harbor EIS (re: 65 th Street and Maspeth).<br />
4. NYMTC – Conduct a <strong>regional</strong> feasibility study of other yard or water access opportunities<br />
(such as <strong>New</strong>town Creek and the South Brooklyn waterfront), building on<br />
NYMTC’s 2002 inventory.<br />
5.3.3 Strategy 3.C – Improve Cross-Hudson Rail Service<br />
Action 1 – Improve Existing Float Services between <strong>New</strong> Jersey and Brooklyn<br />
Description<br />
Bulk cargo is floated across the harbor between Greenville Yards in Jersey City, <strong>New</strong><br />
Jersey, where it interchanges with national rail carriers, and the 51 st Street Yard (Bush<br />
Terminal) in Brooklyn, where it is delivered locally or interchanged with the <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong><br />
and Atlantic Railroad. The volume of this cargo has dwindled in recent years. In 1998, in<br />
an effort to make the existing float service more attractive, the NYCEDC opened two new<br />
float bridges at the 65 th Street Yard in Brooklyn. The Cross Harbor EIS describes the construction<br />
of new float bridges at the Greenville Yards as part of the <strong>Transportation</strong> System<br />
Management (TSM) Alternative. This <strong>plan</strong> would require the active support of <strong>New</strong><br />
Jersey transportation agencies and the PANYNJ.<br />
Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 5-32