28.01.2015 Views

nymtc regional freight plan - New York Metropolitan Transportation ...

nymtc regional freight plan - New York Metropolitan Transportation ...

nymtc regional freight plan - New York Metropolitan Transportation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A Freight Plan for the NYMTC Region<br />

3. Double-stack, Weight, and Lateral Clearance Improvements on Major East-of-Hudson Freight<br />

Lines – The Cross Harbor EIS has considered line improvements to provide a minimum<br />

of 22-foot six-inch vertical clearance between the tunnel portal at 65 th Street and<br />

Maspeth Yard, and 286,000 pound per axle weight compliance for the tracks. The<br />

cross-harbor tunnel system also would provide a wide load route clear of third rail<br />

and passenger platform obstructions.<br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> Impacts<br />

The Cross Harbor Tunnel DEIS includes an extensive analysis of future <strong>freight</strong> movement<br />

demand in the NYMTC region and an analysis of potential expansion of rail <strong>freight</strong> use<br />

resulting from construction of a direct rail <strong>freight</strong> connection across the harbor. According<br />

to the DEIS, a single Cross Harbor tunnel would divert 9.4 million tons of <strong>freight</strong> from<br />

truck to rail in the forecast year of 2025, while a double tunnel would divert 14.9 million<br />

tons. In addition to the traffic diverted from trucks, it is estimated that logistical and<br />

competitive considerations would lead four million tons of rail traffic that would otherwise<br />

be routed via Metro-North’s Hudson Line to be rerouted through the tunnel. 3<br />

According to the Cross Harbor DEIS, this diversion would improve <strong>freight</strong> movement in<br />

the Northern and Southern Crossing corridors but have more limited impacts in other corridors.<br />

The DEIS forecasts that this diversion would reduce the future (2025) volume of<br />

large trucks using the Hudson River crossings by 500,000 to 1,000,000 annual one-way<br />

<strong>freight</strong> truck trips (single versus double tunnel) compared to the future No Build. This is<br />

because shipments diverted from truck by enhanced rail service could cross the Hudson<br />

River by rail, and would not appear as truck trips on the river crossings. On the George<br />

Washington Bridge, the reduction in annual one-way <strong>freight</strong> truck trips would be 141,000<br />

to 333,000 (single versus double tunnel); and on the Verrazano Narrows Bridge, 259,000 to<br />

333,000. Annual truck vehicle miles of travel in the region would be reduced by 41 to 62<br />

million miles out of a future total of 1.4 billion miles.<br />

To put these numbers in perspective, in 2025, <strong>freight</strong> trucks are forecast to represent<br />

almost seven percent of all truck trips in the region. However, <strong>freight</strong> trucks are generally<br />

the largest tractor-trailers which have the greatest impact on congestion, safety, roadway<br />

wear and tear, and emissions. Many of the other trucks are small pick-ups, vans, and<br />

utility vehicles.<br />

The single tunnel system will reduce the combined volume of <strong>freight</strong> trucks on the George<br />

Washington and Verrazano Narrows bridges by 400,000 one-way trips, plus another<br />

100,000 on the Tappan Zee Bridge and other Hudson River crossings. In 2025, the GWB<br />

and VNB are forecast to have a combined <strong>freight</strong> truck volume of about 4.7 million trips.<br />

3<br />

With the tunnel, CSX and CP would find that for much western traffic more frequent direct<br />

service through the new tunnel from Chicago would be superior to less frequent connecting<br />

service from Chicago on the Hudson Line with a classification in Albany. With the tunnel, NS<br />

would be able to compete with CSX for traffic to Long Island and NYC routed through Chicago<br />

that would otherwise be captive to CSX’s Hudson Line routing to <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> City.<br />

Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 5-35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!