nymtc regional freight plan - New York Metropolitan Transportation ...
nymtc regional freight plan - New York Metropolitan Transportation ...
nymtc regional freight plan - New York Metropolitan Transportation ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A Freight Plan for the NYMTC Region<br />
3. Double-stack, Weight, and Lateral Clearance Improvements on Major East-of-Hudson Freight<br />
Lines – The Cross Harbor EIS has considered line improvements to provide a minimum<br />
of 22-foot six-inch vertical clearance between the tunnel portal at 65 th Street and<br />
Maspeth Yard, and 286,000 pound per axle weight compliance for the tracks. The<br />
cross-harbor tunnel system also would provide a wide load route clear of third rail<br />
and passenger platform obstructions.<br />
<strong>Transportation</strong> Impacts<br />
The Cross Harbor Tunnel DEIS includes an extensive analysis of future <strong>freight</strong> movement<br />
demand in the NYMTC region and an analysis of potential expansion of rail <strong>freight</strong> use<br />
resulting from construction of a direct rail <strong>freight</strong> connection across the harbor. According<br />
to the DEIS, a single Cross Harbor tunnel would divert 9.4 million tons of <strong>freight</strong> from<br />
truck to rail in the forecast year of 2025, while a double tunnel would divert 14.9 million<br />
tons. In addition to the traffic diverted from trucks, it is estimated that logistical and<br />
competitive considerations would lead four million tons of rail traffic that would otherwise<br />
be routed via Metro-North’s Hudson Line to be rerouted through the tunnel. 3<br />
According to the Cross Harbor DEIS, this diversion would improve <strong>freight</strong> movement in<br />
the Northern and Southern Crossing corridors but have more limited impacts in other corridors.<br />
The DEIS forecasts that this diversion would reduce the future (2025) volume of<br />
large trucks using the Hudson River crossings by 500,000 to 1,000,000 annual one-way<br />
<strong>freight</strong> truck trips (single versus double tunnel) compared to the future No Build. This is<br />
because shipments diverted from truck by enhanced rail service could cross the Hudson<br />
River by rail, and would not appear as truck trips on the river crossings. On the George<br />
Washington Bridge, the reduction in annual one-way <strong>freight</strong> truck trips would be 141,000<br />
to 333,000 (single versus double tunnel); and on the Verrazano Narrows Bridge, 259,000 to<br />
333,000. Annual truck vehicle miles of travel in the region would be reduced by 41 to 62<br />
million miles out of a future total of 1.4 billion miles.<br />
To put these numbers in perspective, in 2025, <strong>freight</strong> trucks are forecast to represent<br />
almost seven percent of all truck trips in the region. However, <strong>freight</strong> trucks are generally<br />
the largest tractor-trailers which have the greatest impact on congestion, safety, roadway<br />
wear and tear, and emissions. Many of the other trucks are small pick-ups, vans, and<br />
utility vehicles.<br />
The single tunnel system will reduce the combined volume of <strong>freight</strong> trucks on the George<br />
Washington and Verrazano Narrows bridges by 400,000 one-way trips, plus another<br />
100,000 on the Tappan Zee Bridge and other Hudson River crossings. In 2025, the GWB<br />
and VNB are forecast to have a combined <strong>freight</strong> truck volume of about 4.7 million trips.<br />
3<br />
With the tunnel, CSX and CP would find that for much western traffic more frequent direct<br />
service through the new tunnel from Chicago would be superior to less frequent connecting<br />
service from Chicago on the Hudson Line with a classification in Albany. With the tunnel, NS<br />
would be able to compete with CSX for traffic to Long Island and NYC routed through Chicago<br />
that would otherwise be captive to CSX’s Hudson Line routing to <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> City.<br />
Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 5-35