ý.,,: V. ý ýý . - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham

a
250
200
150
100
50
70
60
50
40 ý+
E
30 U
20 0
10
0
E
+o, 4
a, D o
p
co- -1D4-0"1M c -_ -0 +4 ýo 'o
0' a,, c4=°, c vn aca to VI aa --vý a_ c_ 1n a +v
(ý a o
_E+
-o äx E 0aa, ä Inc in
,
ad, IL } Eý =. c c
r0 4-j
4fi
.:
-", +vý. ý cc
aa (D-T 0) ä, ß co Q, ßyß
H
C0
=O- }
H
'v v' O 15-
(
+1 dü Ü4Ü O Q ö
1
Q>
-C
J
>
< Üm wO J U
ä E
_EN" -V
, 4, -Z
ä. ýa
E QJ
0
Lake Names
Figure 3.15a The - correlation between salinity (-"-) and DOC (a ) concentrations in the summer
sampled lakes. Note DOC concentration for Cemetery Lake was too high to record using the TOC
analyser and is noted here as 9999 mg 1-'. The correlation coefficient for the two variables is r=0.895.
140
120
100
p' 80
E
0
ö 60
40
20
0
Figure 3.15b -
DOC levels for the summer-sampled hypersaline (-"-), saline ( ) and freshwater ()
lakes. The lakes are shown in the order (left to right)
in which they were shown in tables la, b and c. The
last hypersaline lake (Cemetery Lake) recorded off the readable scale and is noted here as 9999µg I-'.
87