29.01.2015 Views

ý.,,: V. ý ýý . - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham

ý.,,: V. ý ýý . - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham

ý.,,: V. ý ýý . - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that the ice did not melt out and had a thickness <strong>of</strong> 2m in November (Laybourn-Parry et<br />

al., 2002), indicating inter-annual variation in ice thickness. The increase could be due to<br />

lower temperatures for the 2000 winter compared to the 1999 winter. The 1999 winter<br />

was considered to be unusually mild. As previously mentioned, the Vestfold Hills saw<br />

unusually high precipitation throughout 1999 and 2000 (information courtesy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Bureau <strong>of</strong> Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia).<br />

Epilininion<br />

Ice<br />

Anoxic Sump<br />

Figure 3.19 -<br />

Diagrammatic representation <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> Pendant Lake indicating the anoxic<br />

sump.<br />

The annual water temperatures in Pendant Lake (Fig. 3.2b) were, on average,<br />

higher than those in Ace Lake. This may be due to the near complete mixing <strong>of</strong> the water<br />

column during the winter compared to the permanently stratified Ace Lake. Ace Lake<br />

had a higher summer temperature (Laybourn-Parry et al., 2002), possibly due to solar<br />

heating through the thinner ice cover and surrounding rocks, compared with the relatively<br />

thick ice cover on Pendant Lake which, due to whitening <strong>of</strong> the ice (produced by repeated<br />

freeze/thaw during summer), would act as a reflective barrier to solar heating.<br />

Salinity (Fig 3.4b) was on average lower in Pendant Lake (17.75ppt) than the<br />

mixolimnion<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ace Lake (19.66ppt). Also, salinity throughout the water column was<br />

generally more uniform, with only a small increase at l Om where the sampling bottle<br />

collected some water from the more saline anoxic sump. An exception was in November,<br />

2000, when there was a small decrease in salinity with depth, which could be caused by<br />

an increase in salinity in the surface waters due to exclusion <strong>of</strong> brine through increased<br />

ice formation (Gibson, 1999; Rankin et al., 1999). The salinity pr<strong>of</strong>ile during February<br />

shows the opposite trend, with fresher water at the surface due to ice melt (Fig 3.1 b;<br />

Laybourn-Parry et al., 2002). 98

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!