29.01.2015 Views

ý.,,: V. ý ýý . - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham

ý.,,: V. ý ýý . - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham

ý.,,: V. ý ýý . - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Inorganic nitrogen (NO2, NO3 and NH4) was generally higher in Pendant Lake<br />

than Ace Lake (Gibson, 1999; Laybourn-Parry et al., 2002). Ammonium and nitrate<br />

concentrations were probably higher due to the complete mixing <strong>of</strong> the Pendant Lake<br />

water column; whereas in Ace Lake, inorganic nitrogen settles out <strong>of</strong> the mixolimnion<br />

into the monimolimnion<br />

through the breakdown and diffusion <strong>of</strong> organic matter down the<br />

water column (Hand & Burton, 1981). However, nutrients do diffuse upwards across the<br />

chemocline, providing a localised nutrient pool just above the chemocline (Bell &<br />

Laybourn-Parry, 1999b). Nitrite concentrations (Fig. 3.6b) were virtually the same in<br />

both lakes (2µg<br />

1-1). Generally, inorganic nitrogen species were always measurable, and<br />

therefore not limiting.<br />

Inorganic phosphate (SRP; Fig 3.8b) was higher in Pendant Lake compared to the<br />

mixolimnion <strong>of</strong> Ace Lake. It was not nutrient limiting, reaching its highest concentration<br />

during July at 8-1 Om. SRP dynamics are heavily influenced by biogeochemical processes<br />

in the sediment (Laybourn-Parry et al., 2002). Since Pendant Lake was not stratified, the<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> SRP in the water column would have been influenced by the sediment processes<br />

which would not have occurred in the permanently stratified<br />

Ace Lake.<br />

Dissolved organic carbon (DOC; Fig 3.9b) showed little fluctuation with depth<br />

and time. Overall there was less DOC in Pendant Lake than Ace Lake (Fig 3.9a & b;<br />

Laybourn-Parry et al., 2002). There was a slight decrease in concentration from Om to<br />

I Om during November, which might coincide with an increase in phytoplankton activity<br />

in the upper waters due to increased light levels during the early summer. Laybourn-Parry<br />

et al. (2002) recorded the highest concentrations in November during the summer <strong>of</strong><br />

1999/2000. However, the ice thickness during this month was only 72% <strong>of</strong> November<br />

2000 (Fig 3.1 b), therefore the greater ice thickness would cause greater light attenuation,<br />

which could reduce photosynthetic activity and thus DOC output. DOC was higher<br />

during February compared with the winter, due to an increase in light conditions and a<br />

reduction in ice thickness allowing increased light penetration and intensity.<br />

Chlorophyll a concentrations (Fig 3. l Ob) were generally higher in Pendant Lake<br />

than Ace Lake, showing that the meromictic status <strong>of</strong> Ace Lake probably limits primary<br />

productivity within the oxylimnion (Laybourn-Parry et al., 2002). Chlorophyll a peaked<br />

at 10m during September (-35µg 1-1) levels then decreased during November,<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!