29.01.2015 Views

ý.,,: V. ý ýý . - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham

ý.,,: V. ý ýý . - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham

ý.,,: V. ý ýý . - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

& Bowman, 2001; Labrenz & Hirsch, 2001). The current study attempts to describe the<br />

phenetic relationships between numerous bacteria from a suite <strong>of</strong> lakes in relation to cold<br />

adaptation. The following sections describe the molecular methods used to assess<br />

bacterial biodiversity and biogeography.<br />

1.6.1 -<br />

Bacterial biodiversity<br />

Biodiversity is the irreducible complexity <strong>of</strong> life. Staley and Gosink (1999) refer<br />

to it as the variety and abundance <strong>of</strong> life forms that live on Earth. Biodiversity is the<br />

diversity <strong>of</strong> units <strong>of</strong> life, the basic unit being the species. However, it is also measured as<br />

intraspecific genetic variability and by the richness <strong>of</strong> evolutionary lineages at high<br />

taxonomic levels (Staley & Gosink, 1999). Bacterial biodiversity is one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

challenging aspects <strong>of</strong> microbiology. Traditionally, microbial diversity has been assessed<br />

using phenetic characterisation <strong>of</strong> a pure culture by determination <strong>of</strong> physiology and<br />

morphology (Priest & Austin, 1995) and by the use <strong>of</strong> biochemical tests, serotyping and<br />

enzymatic products (Jayarao et al., 1992a). This approach is limited because <strong>of</strong> its<br />

inability to determine inter-species evolutionary relatedness (Staley & Gosink, 1999) and<br />

since traditional culturing techniques are not capable <strong>of</strong> isolating all bacteria from an<br />

environmental sample, there results a massive under-estimation <strong>of</strong> diversity in natural<br />

habitats (Staley & Gosink, 1999). Within the past twenty years there has been a gradual<br />

shift towards using molecular techniques to identify bacterial strains, which has<br />

revolutionised our concept <strong>of</strong> microbial ecology (Olsen et al., 1986; Pace et al., 1986).<br />

Woese (1987) pioneered the use <strong>of</strong> the RNA from the small ribosomal subunit, 16s or 18s<br />

rRNA. This allowed not only a phylogenetic tree to be produced to show bacterial<br />

evolutionary relatedness, but also provided a basis for revolutionising phenetic<br />

identification (Priest & Austin, 1995). Environmental monitoring has been dramatically<br />

improved with the use <strong>of</strong> direct nucleic acid assessment from environmental samples<br />

without prior culturing (van Elsas et al., 2000). Woese (1987) described 12 divisions<br />

within the Eubacteria based on the analysis <strong>of</strong> cultivated organisms, but with the use <strong>of</strong><br />

culture-independent phylogenetic surveys <strong>of</strong> environmental microbial communities the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> identifiable bacterial divisions has increased three fold to 36 (Pace, 1997;<br />

Hugenholtz et al., 1998). There are a number <strong>of</strong> areas which have been significantly<br />

stimulated by the introduction and development <strong>of</strong> nucleic acid approaches:<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!