29.01.2015 Views

ý.,,: V. ý ýý . - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham

ý.,,: V. ý ýý . - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham

ý.,,: V. ý ýý . - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 3.17a Mean bacterial abundance against mean ammonia concentrations for Ace<br />

Lake<br />

................................................................................................<br />

95<br />

Figure 3.17b Relationship between average bacterial abundance with depth and average<br />

DOC concentration with depth over four sampling dates in Ace Lake<br />

...............<br />

95<br />

Figure 3.18. Relationship between bacterial abundance, PNAN abundance and HNAN<br />

abundance in Ace Lake<br />

.....................................................................<br />

97<br />

Figure 3.19. Diagrammatic representation <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> Pendant Lake indicating the<br />

anoxic sump<br />

.......................................................................................<br />

98<br />

Figure 3.20. Relationship between bacterial, PNAN and HNAN abundances for Pendant<br />

Lake over time as averages <strong>of</strong> depth (0-1 Om) ..................................................<br />

101<br />

Figure 3.22a, b&c<br />

Correlation between bacterial abundance and chlorophyll a<br />

concentration for three sampling dates in 2000, July (a), September (b) and November<br />

(c), in Triple Lake.<br />

.............................................................................<br />

105<br />

Figure 3.21. Ambient air temperature graph for Davis station, Vestfold Hills, Antarctica<br />

(reproduced with the permission <strong>of</strong> the Bureau <strong>of</strong> Meteorology, Melbourne,<br />

Australia)<br />

......................................................................................<br />

107<br />

Figure 4.1. Ice recrystalisation at -6°C for 30 minutes in a (A) AFP solution <strong>of</strong> 30%<br />

sucrose and I mg/ml Fish AFP III, and (B) non-AFP solution <strong>of</strong> 30% sucrose<br />

(Reproduced from Mills, 1999)<br />

...........................................................<br />

116<br />

Figure 4.2. Fryka KP 281 cold block (CamLab) in situ with HTAP microtitre plates<br />

during the recrystalisation step at -6°C in cold room .........................................<br />

117<br />

Figure 4.3. Photographic image <strong>of</strong> a high-throughput AFP assay in a 96 well microtitre<br />

plate. Demonstrating technique and sample colouration<br />

................................<br />

117<br />

Figure 4.4. HTAP assay in a 96 well microtitre plate. Demonstrating lack <strong>of</strong> contrast 119<br />

Figure 4.5. Percentages <strong>of</strong> `SPLAT' assay confirmed AFP active bacteria isolated from<br />

each lake ......................................................................................<br />

123<br />

Figure 4.6. Total cellular protein extraction concentration (mg mUl) with SPLAT score<br />

with error bars for AFP active isolates<br />

..................................................<br />

125<br />

Figure 4.7. Photography <strong>of</strong> SPLAT analysis <strong>of</strong> isolate 494 ................................<br />

125<br />

Figure 5.1. Photographs <strong>of</strong> ARDRA gel patterns used for phenetic analysis <strong>of</strong> band<br />

position along gel (a) Hpa II and (b) Alu I<br />

..................................................<br />

133<br />

iii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!