29.01.2015 Views

ý.,,: V. ý ýý . - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham

ý.,,: V. ý ýý . - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham

ý.,,: V. ý ýý . - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

protein (as might be found in a total cellular protein extract). the inhibitory activity was<br />

still present and could be visualised against a negative control. This suggests that while<br />

the mechanism <strong>of</strong> action is non-colligative, the level <strong>of</strong> activity and ice crystal<br />

morphology are altered by AFP concentration. Secondly, Proteinase K (20mg mL-1.<br />

Sigma) was added to a fish AFP III sample (incubated at 37°C for 1 hour) to destroy the<br />

protein. After this treatment no diffraction was seen in the sample, indicating that ice-<br />

growth inhibition was a result <strong>of</strong> the fish AFP III.<br />

False negatives were ruled out based on the fact that positive controls never<br />

appeared negative, unless there was some practical error when running the protocol. To<br />

make sure that there were no errors, the experiment was always duplicated. However, it is<br />

possible to concede that some bacteria that were AFP active may have appeared falsely<br />

negative because <strong>of</strong> some step <strong>of</strong> the protein extraction protocol or indeed in the HTAP<br />

analysis itself (this will be discussed more in section 4.3).<br />

In field trials using Antarctic bacterial isolates, 1 mg mL-l fish AFP III was used<br />

as a positive control and as an indicator <strong>of</strong> the opacity which AFP activity might produce<br />

in the test solutions. The negative control was a sterile solution <strong>of</strong> 30% sucrose. If the test<br />

solutions were darker/more opaque than the negative control then it was assumed that<br />

these solutions had possible activity. Distinguishing the solutions was <strong>of</strong>ten difficult as<br />

activity in the total cellular protein extracts was <strong>of</strong>ten extremely low (Fig. 4.4).<br />

The actual methodology for the new protocol, named the high-throughput AFP<br />

analysis protocol (HTAP), is as follows. 50 µL <strong>of</strong> 60% sucrose and 50 µL <strong>of</strong> protein<br />

extract were aliquoted into 96 well microtitre plate. Fish AFP III (lmg mL-' with 30%<br />

sucrose) was used as a positive control and 30% sucrose solution as a negative control.<br />

The plates were placed at -70°C (cryo-freezer) for 10 minutes to supercool the samples<br />

(producing embryonic ice crystals). The microtitre plate was then placed on a cold plate<br />

(CamLab, Fryka KP 281) for recrystallisation. The cold plate was pre-cooled to -6°C and<br />

stored in a cold room with an ambient temperature <strong>of</strong> -6°C, this ensured that there Was no<br />

thermal difference (caused by ambient air temperature) within the solution. The plate was<br />

viewed after 5 days using a light box in the cold room. so observation could occur at -6°C<br />

to prevent temperature change within the sample altering ice-crystal size. The microtitre<br />

plates were placed on a transparent plastic platform 15cm from the surface<br />

118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!