29.01.2015 Views

ý.,,: V. ý ýý . - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham

ý.,,: V. ý ýý . - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham

ý.,,: V. ý ýý . - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The two restriction enzyme digest patterns were very similar but did show some<br />

differences. The isolates which clustered with M protea (154,124.5ice3.744.794.214<br />

and 54), showed the same clustering for both digests (Figs. 5.2a & b) indicating they<br />

were probably all the same species. Isolates 39 and 86 were probably also identical as<br />

they formed a single taxon with both restriction enzymes (Figs. 5.2a & b). Isolates 302<br />

and 33 appeared to form a single taxon with Hpa II (Fig 5.2a), however, with Alu I they<br />

formed two separate taxa while still clustering together (Fig 5.2b), indicating that these<br />

two isolates had a higher similarity to each other than to any <strong>of</strong> the other isolates. The<br />

same situation was also shown by isolates 492 and 47. Isolate 494 appears as a direct<br />

outlier to the M protea taxon in both digest patterns indicating a distant relationship.<br />

Isolates 583 and 213 appear within the same group in both patterns, however, the degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> relatedness differs for the different enzymes. Using Alu I (Fig 5.2b) they clustered<br />

together with isolate 53 which when digested with Hpa II was found within the same<br />

group but at a different degree <strong>of</strong> relatedness (Fig 5.2a). Isolate 466 moved from an<br />

outlier <strong>of</strong> the 39/86 taxon using Hpa II (Fig 5.2a), to an outlier <strong>of</strong> the M protea taxon<br />

when using Alu I (Fig 5.2b). Isolate 732 shows a similar jump in position from a<br />

taxonomic grouping with the 302/33 taxon when using Hpa II (Fig 5.2a), to a grouping<br />

with the 39/86 taxon when using Alu I (Fig 5.2b).<br />

5.2.2 -16S rRNA nucleotide sequencing<br />

PCR products were purified using the QlAquick PCR purification centrifugation<br />

protocol (QIAGEN),<br />

eluted in water and then sequenced directly (Chapter 2, section<br />

2.9.6.4). The majority <strong>of</strong> the isolates provided approximately Ikb <strong>of</strong> nucleotide sequence<br />

directly from the PCR product. However, some <strong>of</strong> the PCR products failed to produce<br />

adequate sequence using this method; these sequences were cloned into the TOPO 2.1<br />

vector (Chapter 2, section 2.9.6.3) using the TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen). and<br />

sequenced using the M 13 forward and reverse primers. This provided better sequencing<br />

results for the remaining isolates. Isolates 494,213,492,5(ice3)<br />

and 466 proved difficult<br />

to clone and so these sequences have not be adequately sequenced, as time constraints did<br />

not allow further attempts.<br />

The available sequence data for the 16S rDNA gene was entered into the Genbank<br />

database (http: //wNti-w. ncbi. nlm. nih. ) and assigned an accession number (Table 5.1).<br />

136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!