06.02.2015 Views

ey-global-tax-policy-outlook-for-2015

ey-global-tax-policy-outlook-for-2015

ey-global-tax-policy-outlook-for-2015

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

to understand; if governments are<br />

going to agree to changes to the Model<br />

Convention, we can’t af<strong>for</strong>d to wait<br />

<strong>for</strong> bilateral treaty changes to deliver<br />

results, something that can take from<br />

10 to 15 years. The important thing is<br />

that the multilateral instrument only<br />

comes into play once there is agreement<br />

on the substance. So it’s purely a<br />

technical initiative on how to get a<br />

quick implementation.<br />

Into <strong>2015</strong><br />

Looking <strong>for</strong>ward, the Actions where I<br />

<br />

Action 5 (Harmful <strong>tax</strong> practices) and<br />

more generally on the interface between<br />

the different Action points that relate<br />

to transfer pricing. Then, of course, the<br />

<br />

remaining eight Actions. That’s going to<br />

be a whole new set of challenges but,<br />

<br />

their deadlines.<br />

<br />

to distinguish between the emphasis<br />

that’s being placed on the transparency<br />

issues and the fact that, even be<strong>for</strong>e the<br />

so-called Luxembourg leaks, countries<br />

had already agreed to automatic<br />

exchange on rulings. The recent<br />

European Commission developments<br />

on this issue, where we expect a new<br />

<br />

to those within the BEPS Project.<br />

The second aspect that’s important is<br />

the focus on intellectual property and<br />

patent boxes. There’s still quite a lot of<br />

work there to see how the patent box<br />

<br />

United Kingdom can be implemented,<br />

and new countries may well demand<br />

transitional rules that the United<br />

Kingdom has gained. There is a danger<br />

here that we’ll go down the same route<br />

as we went down 15 years ago with<br />

tonnage <strong>tax</strong>es, whereby we could see<br />

a large extension of low-rate IP boxes<br />

around the world that are broadly<br />

consistent with Action 5 but which<br />

undermine the corporate <strong>tax</strong> base.<br />

Transfer pricing<br />

In regard to transfer pricing, it wasn’t<br />

surprising that fast progress was made<br />

in the area of intangibles, as a lot of the<br />

groundwork had already been done prior<br />

<br />

pricing area is that, again, you can’t look<br />

at one Action point in isolation — you<br />

need to look at all of them in context<br />

of one another. Here, again, is a case<br />

of nothing being agreed upon until<br />

absolutely everything is in place. That<br />

can generate uncertainty <strong>for</strong> business..<br />

<br />

getting through that this is going to<br />

happen and that companies need to<br />

start preparing. Just a year ago, there<br />

were many people who still thought it<br />

wasn’t going to be delivered. But we<br />

now know that it’s a reality. There are<br />

still some k<strong>ey</strong> open issues, and we still<br />

need to see more detail on how it’s all<br />

going to be implemented, but the basic<br />

standards are now there and it’s going<br />

<br />

but important question is whether the<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation will be transmitted by the<br />

usual treaty route, and if so, what are the<br />

resource implications of that and how will<br />

countries meet the timing deadlines<br />

My own view is that there’s a good<br />

<br />

looking at the underlying technical<br />

plat<strong>for</strong>ms, to bypass the traditional<br />

treaty route, to try to minimize the<br />

compliance burden <strong>for</strong> companies and<br />

to maximize the value of the in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

to countries.<br />

When you consider that we will now have<br />

automatic, spontaneous and on-request<br />

exchange of in<strong>for</strong>mation, country-bycountry<br />

reporting and transfer pricing<br />

<br />

is that <strong>tax</strong> administrations are going<br />

to have unprecedented access to<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation. But some of them aren’t<br />

able to leverage the in<strong>for</strong>mation that<br />

th<strong>ey</strong> already have today.<br />

So the question is whether governments<br />

are going to be willing to make the<br />

investment into how th<strong>ey</strong> use all this<br />

data. It would be a real waste of ef<strong>for</strong>t<br />

on everyone’s part if this mass of<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation ended up left to rot in a box<br />

somewhere. And of course, the whole<br />

of country–by–country reporting will be<br />

reviewed in 2020, so it’ll be fascinating<br />

to see what the negotiations focus on at<br />

that point.<br />

Disclosure<br />

Action 12 on disclosure of aggressive<br />

<strong>tax</strong> planning arrangements is going to<br />

be an interesting one in <strong>2015</strong>. It should<br />

<br />

<strong>for</strong>ward on this. Th<strong>ey</strong>’ll be picking up<br />

on the experiences of Australia, the UK<br />

and the United States, countries that<br />

already have regimes in place. This is<br />

all part of the general tendency to have<br />

The <strong>outlook</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>global</strong> <strong>tax</strong> <strong>policy</strong> in <strong>2015</strong> |<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!