ey-global-tax-policy-outlook-for-2015
ey-global-tax-policy-outlook-for-2015
ey-global-tax-policy-outlook-for-2015
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
to understand; if governments are<br />
going to agree to changes to the Model<br />
Convention, we can’t af<strong>for</strong>d to wait<br />
<strong>for</strong> bilateral treaty changes to deliver<br />
results, something that can take from<br />
10 to 15 years. The important thing is<br />
that the multilateral instrument only<br />
comes into play once there is agreement<br />
on the substance. So it’s purely a<br />
technical initiative on how to get a<br />
quick implementation.<br />
Into <strong>2015</strong><br />
Looking <strong>for</strong>ward, the Actions where I<br />
<br />
Action 5 (Harmful <strong>tax</strong> practices) and<br />
more generally on the interface between<br />
the different Action points that relate<br />
to transfer pricing. Then, of course, the<br />
<br />
remaining eight Actions. That’s going to<br />
be a whole new set of challenges but,<br />
<br />
their deadlines.<br />
<br />
to distinguish between the emphasis<br />
that’s being placed on the transparency<br />
issues and the fact that, even be<strong>for</strong>e the<br />
so-called Luxembourg leaks, countries<br />
had already agreed to automatic<br />
exchange on rulings. The recent<br />
European Commission developments<br />
on this issue, where we expect a new<br />
<br />
to those within the BEPS Project.<br />
The second aspect that’s important is<br />
the focus on intellectual property and<br />
patent boxes. There’s still quite a lot of<br />
work there to see how the patent box<br />
<br />
United Kingdom can be implemented,<br />
and new countries may well demand<br />
transitional rules that the United<br />
Kingdom has gained. There is a danger<br />
here that we’ll go down the same route<br />
as we went down 15 years ago with<br />
tonnage <strong>tax</strong>es, whereby we could see<br />
a large extension of low-rate IP boxes<br />
around the world that are broadly<br />
consistent with Action 5 but which<br />
undermine the corporate <strong>tax</strong> base.<br />
Transfer pricing<br />
In regard to transfer pricing, it wasn’t<br />
surprising that fast progress was made<br />
in the area of intangibles, as a lot of the<br />
groundwork had already been done prior<br />
<br />
pricing area is that, again, you can’t look<br />
at one Action point in isolation — you<br />
need to look at all of them in context<br />
of one another. Here, again, is a case<br />
of nothing being agreed upon until<br />
absolutely everything is in place. That<br />
can generate uncertainty <strong>for</strong> business..<br />
<br />
getting through that this is going to<br />
happen and that companies need to<br />
start preparing. Just a year ago, there<br />
were many people who still thought it<br />
wasn’t going to be delivered. But we<br />
now know that it’s a reality. There are<br />
still some k<strong>ey</strong> open issues, and we still<br />
need to see more detail on how it’s all<br />
going to be implemented, but the basic<br />
standards are now there and it’s going<br />
<br />
but important question is whether the<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation will be transmitted by the<br />
usual treaty route, and if so, what are the<br />
resource implications of that and how will<br />
countries meet the timing deadlines<br />
My own view is that there’s a good<br />
<br />
looking at the underlying technical<br />
plat<strong>for</strong>ms, to bypass the traditional<br />
treaty route, to try to minimize the<br />
compliance burden <strong>for</strong> companies and<br />
to maximize the value of the in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
to countries.<br />
When you consider that we will now have<br />
automatic, spontaneous and on-request<br />
exchange of in<strong>for</strong>mation, country-bycountry<br />
reporting and transfer pricing<br />
<br />
is that <strong>tax</strong> administrations are going<br />
to have unprecedented access to<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation. But some of them aren’t<br />
able to leverage the in<strong>for</strong>mation that<br />
th<strong>ey</strong> already have today.<br />
So the question is whether governments<br />
are going to be willing to make the<br />
investment into how th<strong>ey</strong> use all this<br />
data. It would be a real waste of ef<strong>for</strong>t<br />
on everyone’s part if this mass of<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation ended up left to rot in a box<br />
somewhere. And of course, the whole<br />
of country–by–country reporting will be<br />
reviewed in 2020, so it’ll be fascinating<br />
to see what the negotiations focus on at<br />
that point.<br />
Disclosure<br />
Action 12 on disclosure of aggressive<br />
<strong>tax</strong> planning arrangements is going to<br />
be an interesting one in <strong>2015</strong>. It should<br />
<br />
<strong>for</strong>ward on this. Th<strong>ey</strong>’ll be picking up<br />
on the experiences of Australia, the UK<br />
and the United States, countries that<br />
already have regimes in place. This is<br />
all part of the general tendency to have<br />
The <strong>outlook</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>global</strong> <strong>tax</strong> <strong>policy</strong> in <strong>2015</strong> |<br />
15