ey-global-tax-policy-outlook-for-2015
ey-global-tax-policy-outlook-for-2015
ey-global-tax-policy-outlook-for-2015
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
United States<br />
2.4 Tax <strong>policy</strong> <strong>outlook</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>2015</strong> — detail<br />
Corporate income <strong>tax</strong>es<br />
Tax re<strong>for</strong>m<br />
• Tax re<strong>for</strong>m. The chairmen of the congressional <strong>tax</strong>-writing<br />
<br />
Hatch of Utah, support comprehensive <strong>tax</strong> re<strong>for</strong>m (covering<br />
both businesses and individuals) that lowers <strong>tax</strong> rates and<br />
<br />
business <strong>tax</strong> re<strong>for</strong>m that would be revenue neutral in<br />
the long-run (combining revenue raising provisions with<br />
incentives that cost mon<strong>ey</strong>). While far apart in the details,<br />
<br />
business <strong>tax</strong> re<strong>for</strong>m should be a priority this year.<br />
• The Administration’s FY 2016 budget, released 2 February<br />
<strong>2015</strong>, like prior budgets, contains a reserve fund <strong>for</strong><br />
business <strong>tax</strong> re<strong>for</strong>m. While many of the provisions are<br />
carryover items, meaning th<strong>ey</strong> have been included in past<br />
budgets, the Administration included some new proposals<br />
that are generating discussion. Among them are a proposed<br />
one-time 14% transition <strong>tax</strong> on un<strong>tax</strong>ed <strong>for</strong>eign earnings<br />
of US companies, and a proposed minimum 19% <strong>tax</strong> on<br />
US companies’ <strong>for</strong>eign earnings going <strong>for</strong>ward. Under<br />
the Administration’s proposal, the revenue from the onetime<br />
transition <strong>tax</strong> would be devoted to infrastructure<br />
investments.<br />
• <br />
to support “middle-class economics.” It contains proposals<br />
that would raise the top capital gains and dividend <strong>tax</strong><br />
<br />
and increase <strong>tax</strong>es on high-income <strong>tax</strong>payers. Revenue<br />
from these changes would then be used toward <strong>tax</strong> policies<br />
intended to help the middle class.<br />
• <br />
Administration, it is important to note that it is not a<br />
legislative proposal. Legislation would still need to be<br />
enacted through the legislative process <strong>for</strong> these policies<br />
to come into effect. And as many of these proposals have<br />
received a cool reception from congressional Republicans,<br />
it remains to be seen whether these provisions could gain<br />
traction in the current Congress.<br />
• Meanwhile, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Hatch<br />
<br />
<br />
explore different <strong>policy</strong> areas, with the intent of introducing<br />
and considering a <strong>tax</strong> re<strong>for</strong>m bill this year. Sen. Hatch<br />
has said <strong>tax</strong> re<strong>for</strong>m is necessary and should encourage<br />
job creation and economic growth, make the <strong>tax</strong> system<br />
more internationally competitive, and lower rates. Finance<br />
<br />
principles, which include increased progressivity and a<br />
narrowing of the disparity between the <strong>tax</strong>ation of capital<br />
and wage income. For his part, House Ways and Means<br />
Committee Chairman Ryan has said Republican control of<br />
the Senate would lead to “a very bold ef<strong>for</strong>t” on <strong>tax</strong> re<strong>for</strong>m.<br />
Chairman Ryan has also said he planned to put <strong>tax</strong> re<strong>for</strong>m on<br />
a fast track in his committee. However, political differences<br />
regarding the scope of <strong>tax</strong> re<strong>for</strong>m and the revenue<br />
parameters of such legislation may delay action.<br />
Tax extenders<br />
• <br />
end of 2013. These include major corporate items such as<br />
<br />
last acts of 2014, Congress extended virtually all of these<br />
provisions, but only through 2014. Lawmakers are expected<br />
to revisit these issues in <strong>2015</strong>.<br />
Taxes on wages and employment<br />
• Under the Af<strong>for</strong>dable Care Act (ACA), beginning in <strong>2015</strong>,<br />
“large employers” are subject to excise <strong>tax</strong>es, which are<br />
generally imposed if the employer does not offer a certain<br />
level of health care coverage to its full-time employees,<br />
and those employees purchase coverage through a health<br />
insurance exchange and receive a premium <strong>tax</strong> credit. Also<br />
<br />
to meet new and expansive health insurance in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
reporting requirements.<br />
• The US Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Windsor holding<br />
<br />
gender couple has resulted in numerous states overturning<br />
their bans on same-gender marriage. The result has been<br />
<br />
<br />
gender spouse. The Supreme Court in January said it<br />
would rule on two questions later this year — whether the<br />
Fourteenth Amendment requires states to license marriages<br />
between same-gender couples, and whether it requires<br />
states to recognize same-gender marriages licensed and<br />
per<strong>for</strong>med in other states, and the Court’s ruling could have<br />
further implications in this area.<br />
• <br />
increased their focus on whether employers are improperly<br />
treating their workers as independent contractors rather<br />
than employees <strong>for</strong> <strong>tax</strong> purposes. The courts showed a<br />
<br />
employees. These events are challenging employers to<br />
review the status of their independent contractors.<br />
The <strong>outlook</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>global</strong> <strong>tax</strong> <strong>policy</strong> in <strong>2015</strong> | 193