Amateur-built and experimental aircraft - Australian Transport Safety ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

National Transport Safety Bureau. (2002). Annual Review of Aircraft Accident Data, U.S. General Aviation, Calendar Year 2002,NTSB/ARG-06/02 PB2007- 100696. Washington, D.C.: National Transport Safety Bureau. National Transport Safety Bureau. (2003). Annual Review of Aircraft Accident Data, U.S. General Aviation, Calendar Year 2003,NTSB/ARG-07/01 PB2007- 105388. Washington, D.C.: National Transport Safety Bureau. National Transport Safety Bureau. (2004). Annual Review of Aircraft Accident Data, U.S. General Aviation, Calendar Year 2004,NTSB/ARG-08/01 PB2009- 101761. Washington, D.C.: National Transport Safety Bureau. Neill, J. (2009). The Concept of Challenge: Growth via stress with support. retrieved on 18 January 2009 from http://wilderdom.com/risk/ChallengeConceptGrowthByStressWithSupport.html. Nelson, N.L., & Goldman, S.M. (2003). Maintenance-related accidents: A comparison of amateur-built aircraft to all other general aviation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47 th Annual Meeting 2003, 191-193. Pattillo, D.M. (1998). A History in the Making, 80 Turbulent Years in the American General Aviation Industry. New York: McGraw-Hill. Recreational Aviation Australia. (2009). Aircraft Register, retrieved from http://www.raa.asn.au/admin/aircraft_register.html on 8 April 2009. Rogers, F. (1974). Editorial. Australian Airsport, August, 3. Rogers, F. (1976). Editorial. Australian Airsport, September-October, 3. Rogers, F. (1978). Australian Homebuilt Aircraft. Mentone, Victoria: Sport Aircraft Association of Australia. Rogers, F. (1997). Amateur Built Aircraft Data Book. Mentone: Sports Aircraft Association of Australia. Sport Aircraft Association of Australia. (2009). Maintenance training course (in conjunction with the Sport Aircraft Operations Group), retrieved from http://www.saaa.com/home.php on 1 May 2009. Seeley. B.A., Stephens, C.J. (1996). Cafe Foundation Aircraft Performance Report, Glasair III. Santa Rosa, California: Comparative Aircraft Flight Efficiency, Inc. Seeley. B.A., Stephens, C.J. (1997). Cafe Foundation Aircraft Performance Report, Express. Santa Rosa, California: Comparative Aircraft Flight Efficiency, Inc. Seeley. B.A., Stephens, C.J. (1999a). Cafe Foundation Aircraft Performance Report, Lancair IVP. Santa Rosa, California: Comparative Aircraft Flight Efficiency, Inc. Seeley. B.A., Stephens, C.J. (1999b). Cafe Foundation Aircraft Performance Report, Europa. Santa Rosa, California: Comparative Aircraft Flight Efficiency, Inc. Seeley. B.A., Stephens, C.J. (n.d.). Cafe Foundation Aircraft Performance Report, Falco F8.L. Santa Rosa, California: Comparative Aircraft Flight Efficiency, Inc. - 114 -
Van’s Aircraft Inc. (2009). Making The Decision – Complete Aircraft Cost Estimator. Retrieved 23 April 2009, from . Walmsley, J. (1973). Building a Taylor Monoplane. Australian Airsport, March, 6. Wanttaja, R. (2004). How Safe Are They? Kitplanes, October, 21-27. Wanttaja, R. (2006a). Part 1: Homebuilt Aircraft, How Safe Are They? Kitplanes, September, 28-32. Wanttaja, R. (2006b). Part 2: Ouch Builder Error Stings. Kitplanes, October, 21-27. Wanttaja, R. (2006c). Kit Airplane Construction (3 rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. Wanttaja, R. (2008). Homebuilt Aircraft Safety 1998-2008. Kitplanes, October, 25- 31. Watkins,W. (1973). Weight Watching. Australian Airsport, November, 4-5. Whittier, N. (1958). Popular Flying in the U.S.A. Flight, 12 September 1958, 466- 468. Yager, K. (1974). Aircraft engines versus car engines. Australian Airsport, March, 21. Zapletal, J. (1973). Letters to the editor. Australian Airsport, February, 12-13. - 115 -
Page 1:
ATSB TRANSPORT SAFETY REPORT Aviati
Page 4 and 5:
Published by: Australian Transport
Page 6 and 7:
3.2.6 Type of flying performed in A
Page 8 and 9:
THE AUSTRALIAN TRANSPORT SAFETY BUR
Page 10 and 11:
- viii -
Page 12 and 13:
GAS General Aviation Survey GAAS Ge
Page 14 and 15:
Collectively, these aircraft are ca
Page 16 and 17:
Figure 4: A SeaRey amphibious aircr
Page 18 and 19:
comparison to ABE aircraft. 4 For e
Page 20 and 21:
picture of why people built aircraf
Page 22 and 23:
the Australian civil aircraft regis
Page 24 and 25:
Figure 11: Amateur Built Aircraft A
Page 26 and 27:
One of the great sticking points fo
Page 28 and 29:
Committee (the Committee); committe
Page 30 and 31:
The variety of aircraft administere
Page 32 and 33:
1.6 Aims 1.7 Scope The aims of this
Page 34 and 35:
18 per cent of aircraft did not fly
Page 36 and 37:
Maintenance, cost, age and comments
Page 38 and 39:
It is not always clear if stall spe
Page 40 and 41:
phenomenon, means are reported alon
Page 42 and 43:
- 30 -
Page 44 and 45:
3.2 Respondents 3.2.1 Age The ABE a
Page 46 and 47:
Figure 18: Type of flying performed
Page 48 and 49:
Three survey respondents reported f
Page 50 and 51:
3.2.6 Type of flying performed in A
Page 52 and 53:
there are sufficient numbers on the
Page 54 and 55:
Year of design The year of design,
Page 56 and 57:
Source: Falco Builders Newsletter D
Page 58 and 59:
Figure 34: Aircraft flight rules Ci
Page 60 and 61:
the wing loading. In this instance,
Page 62 and 63:
Figure 38: Aircraft airframe hours
Page 64 and 65:
Figure 39: Build and operating cert
Page 66 and 67:
Figure 41: Rating of personal satis
Page 68 and 69:
In relation to ability to customise
Page 70 and 71:
Figure 46: Rating of the ability to
Page 72 and 73:
Figure 48: Number of aircraft built
Page 74 and 75:
According to build hours data for a
Page 76 and 77: Table 6: Aircraft modifications wit
Page 78 and 79: engine, fuel system, avionics, hydr
Page 80 and 81: challenging (χ 2 = 2.89, p = 0.09,
Page 82 and 83: associated with building an aircraf
Page 84 and 85: people built aircraft by 41 differe
Page 86 and 87: Figure 68: Rating of other aircraft
Page 88 and 89: Figure 71: Rating of regulator as a
Page 90 and 91: flew more or much more than usual.
Page 92 and 93: Figure 75: Mean rating of test flig
Page 94 and 95: LAMEs as a test flight resource Fig
Page 96 and 97: another pilot, 46 of 268 used a qua
Page 98 and 99: Emergency procedures. Two people ma
Page 100 and 101: 3.7 Aircraft building cost Total ai
Page 102 and 103: Figure 87: Nice-to-have documents o
Page 104 and 105: Where people undertook transition t
Page 106 and 107: Table 8: Private versus all other s
Page 108 and 109: Table 13: Transition training by se
Page 110 and 111: must be endorsed under CAO 40.1.0 t
Page 112 and 113: 3.9.5 When transition training was
Page 114 and 115: As pointed out in An Overview of Hu
Page 116 and 117: Amateur-built and experimental airc
Page 118 and 119: Figure 98: Engine maintenance multi
Page 120 and 121: - 108 -
Page 122 and 123: About half the respondents spent be
Page 124 and 125: Cessna Aircraft Company. (2009). Sk
Page 128 and 129: - 116 -
Page 130 and 131: APPENDIX B: SURVEY - 118 -
Page 132 and 133: - 120 -
Page 134 and 135: - 122 -
Page 136 and 137: - 124 -
Page 138 and 139: APPENDIX C: TABLES OF RESPONSES Bui
Page 140 and 141: Table 27: Maiden flight by transiti
Page 142: Amateur-built and experimental airc
show all

Amateur-built and experimental aircraft - Australian Transport Safety ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?