Amateur-built and experimental aircraft - Australian Transport Safety ...
Amateur-built and experimental aircraft - Australian Transport Safety ...
Amateur-built and experimental aircraft - Australian Transport Safety ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
o Better recording of engine operating details for later analysis.<br />
SAAA. Three people made comments in relation to services provided by the SAAA<br />
<strong>and</strong> these were:<br />
o I would use a SAAA Flight Advisor. This service was not available at the<br />
time.<br />
o Talk to SAAA flight advisor <strong>and</strong> pick a better test pilot for initial flights.<br />
o Use [the] SAAA Test Flight Manual.<br />
Use of time. Two respondents talked about the process of structuring test flight<br />
stating:<br />
o More information about dangers of flight testing close to performance<br />
envelope limits.<br />
o Flight testing took place [number {a few}] years ago when not as much<br />
emphasis was put into the flight test regime as is done now. I used a Flight<br />
Test schedule that proved adequate for flying off the test hours, however,<br />
further hours for completing the flight envelope in some structured manner<br />
would have been useful. These days the SAAA has a more comprehensive<br />
schedule <strong>and</strong> program plus suggested training in place which is a great<br />
improvement.<br />
Aircraft h<strong>and</strong>ling after test flight<br />
A person buying ABE <strong>aircraft</strong> plans or a kit, generally does so with reference to<br />
<strong>aircraft</strong> performance. Each ABE <strong>aircraft</strong> is slightly different, <strong>and</strong> to some degree<br />
this probably influences its h<strong>and</strong>ling characteristics. In order to build a picture of<br />
expectations about ABE <strong>aircraft</strong>, respondents were asked to rate how the <strong>aircraft</strong><br />
performed after test flight.<br />
About 40 per cent of people recorded their <strong>aircraft</strong> performed as expected, while<br />
about 35 per cent recorded that their <strong>aircraft</strong> performed better than expected. About<br />
20 per cent thought their <strong>aircraft</strong> performed much better than expected, while less<br />
than one per cent thought the <strong>aircraft</strong> performed poorer than expected. It is possible<br />
that respondents who rated <strong>aircraft</strong> performance as better, or much better than<br />
expected, transitioned from certified general aviation <strong>aircraft</strong> to a higher<br />
performance <strong>aircraft</strong>. Alternatively, the result may reflect an element of surprise, or<br />
satisfaction at achieving a result beyond expectation.<br />
Figure 84: Aircraft performance after test flight<br />
- 87 -