The Big Lie 9-11 and Government Complicity in Mass Murder [PDF]
The Big Lie 9-11 and Government Complicity in Mass Murder [PDF]
The Big Lie 9-11 and Government Complicity in Mass Murder [PDF]
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Big</strong> <strong>Lie</strong>” 9/<strong>11</strong> <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Government</strong>’s<br />
<strong>Complicity</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mass</strong> <strong>Murder</strong><br />
<strong>11</strong>6<br />
If the video captured by the camera seized by the FBI supported the U.S. position<br />
then the footage would be more fully released <strong>and</strong> with more detail <strong>and</strong><br />
clarity. <strong>The</strong> government is fully aware that many people doubt the official version<br />
of the story <strong>and</strong> could easily put those concerns to rest by releas<strong>in</strong>g more film, or<br />
the films of the local Sheraton Hotel, Virg<strong>in</strong>ia VDOT highway camera videos, or<br />
the gasol<strong>in</strong>e station close to the Pentagon Apparently, from the suspicious<br />
manner of the government’s actions, the video does not tend to support the<br />
official story, <strong>and</strong> hence is suppressed. Be honest with yourself, is the government<br />
act<strong>in</strong>g like a guilty party with someth<strong>in</strong>g to hide? If you determ<strong>in</strong>e that it is hid<strong>in</strong>g<br />
someth<strong>in</strong>g, then you reasonably have to ask then what could it be hid<strong>in</strong>g that is so<br />
bad for its stated official position that would justify the secrecy? You already<br />
know the answer without even requir<strong>in</strong>g the evidence. <strong>The</strong> world desperately<br />
awaits the leak of the equivalent of the JFK Zapruder 6 film for 9/<strong>11</strong>.<br />
Andrews Air Force Base (AFB) Did Not Respond.<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ally, the home base of Air Force One, the President’s pair of nuclear hardened<br />
Boe<strong>in</strong>g 747-200B’s, has two squadrons of fighters that were not used to defend<br />
Wash<strong>in</strong>gton D.C. until it was too late. Why? Andrews Air Force Base (AFB) is<br />
only about 10 miles away from the Pentagon <strong>and</strong> downtown Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, D.C. 7<br />
Instead of scrambl<strong>in</strong>g directly from Andrews AFB, fighters were scrambled from<br />
bases 129 miles away at Langley, Virg<strong>in</strong>ia. Furthermore, the attack <strong>and</strong> collision<br />
was allowed nearly 40 m<strong>in</strong>utes AFTER it was widely known that hijacked aircraft<br />
were be<strong>in</strong>g used as weapons <strong>and</strong> after both WTC-1 & 2 collisions. 8<br />
• Official Denial of Fighter Squadrons: It was orig<strong>in</strong>ally claimed that there<br />
weren’t fighter aircraft assigned to Andrews AFB. At the same time, media<br />
sources were also claim<strong>in</strong>g that fighters were assigned to Andrews AFB,<br />
but that no <strong>in</strong>tercepts were scrambled because the fighters were not on<br />
alert. NORAD comm<strong>and</strong>er Major General Larry Arnold has said, "We<br />
[didn't] have any aircraft on alert at Andrews." 9