The Big Lie 9-11 and Government Complicity in Mass Murder [PDF]
The Big Lie 9-11 and Government Complicity in Mass Murder [PDF]
The Big Lie 9-11 and Government Complicity in Mass Murder [PDF]
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Big</strong> <strong>Lie</strong>” 9/<strong>11</strong> <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Government</strong>’s<br />
<strong>Complicity</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mass</strong> <strong>Murder</strong><br />
124<br />
tell<strong>in</strong>g me that they were not sure they were gonna<br />
be able to conta<strong>in</strong> the fire, <strong>and</strong> I said, "We've had<br />
such terrible loss of life; maybe the smartest th<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull <strong>and</strong><br />
we watched the build<strong>in</strong>g collapse.” 26<br />
Moments later <strong>in</strong> the film, a demolition worker uses the same term “pull,” when<br />
he, <strong>in</strong> the same context, discusses trigger<strong>in</strong>g the implosion of the damaged<br />
WTC-6 build<strong>in</strong>g. Evidence of the customary usage of “pull” as an <strong>in</strong>dustry used<br />
term comes from the very same company that managed the clean-up of the WTC<br />
attacks, as well as co<strong>in</strong>cidentally, the cleanup of the Oklahoma City Murrah<br />
Federal Build<strong>in</strong>g attacks, Controlled Demolition, Inc. From CDI’s corporate<br />
website, the term “pull” refers to controlled demolition. 27<br />
An experienced demolition team cannot place charges <strong>in</strong> a burn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> smokefilled<br />
build<strong>in</strong>g of 47 stories, let alone <strong>in</strong> an unfamiliar structure <strong>in</strong> a few hours<br />
notice, <strong>and</strong> then have it collapse <strong>in</strong> a textbook implosion <strong>in</strong>to its own footpr<strong>in</strong>t.<br />
It’s impossible. It’s utterly unbelievable. <strong>The</strong> charges had to be placed before<br />
h<strong>and</strong>. 28<br />
Silverste<strong>in</strong>’s shock<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>and</strong> profoundly stupid) admission was never the subject of<br />
any proper <strong>in</strong>quiry dur<strong>in</strong>g the 9/<strong>11</strong> Commission’s <strong>in</strong>vestigation, <strong>and</strong> he has not<br />
given any follow-up comment regard<strong>in</strong>g it. Silverste<strong>in</strong>’s name, as the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple<br />
leaseholder for the World Trade Center Complex, appears only twice <strong>in</strong> the entire<br />
9/<strong>11</strong> Commission Report, <strong>and</strong> not <strong>in</strong> any reference to the admission <strong>in</strong> the<br />
documentary. 29 His admission of order<strong>in</strong>g the controlled demolition of WTC-7,<br />
under normal circumstances, should have been immediately followed up by law<br />
enforcement or by the 9/<strong>11</strong> Commission if there truly was a thorough, “leave no<br />
stone unturned” <strong>in</strong>vestigation, <strong>and</strong> is by itself, solely sufficient for <strong>in</strong>dictment.<br />
Why has there not been any official <strong>in</strong>quiry to this strange statement? Why<br />
haven’t the <strong>in</strong>surance companies that paid out his claim raised any questions or