The Big Lie 9-11 and Government Complicity in Mass Murder [PDF]

The Big Lie” 9/11 and the Government’s
Complicity in Mass Murder
21
Chapter 2: Lessons of History and Abuses of Trust
In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned
that way ~ Franklin D. Roosevelt
You might be saying to yourself that the benevolent U.S. government would never
do anything so horrible as to conspire and execute staged attacks upon its own
citizens. You are probably thinking this is all ridiculous, the paranoid delusions of
some moonbat conspiracy theorist. Such understandably incendiary discussions
are usually sidestepped or ridiculed by shilled government media mouthpieces
with comments such as: “that is beyond the pale,” “revisionist,” or even countered
directly, and with the air of national authority. As if almost anticipating the
onslaught of doubts and challenges to the ‘official version’ of 9/11, with an
attempt to issue a preemptive deflection, President Bush equated conspiracy
theories as promoting terrorism when he spoke before the United Nations on
November 10th, 2001:
We must speak the truth about terror. Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy
theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th, malicious lies that attempt
to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty. To
inflame ethnic hatred is to advance the cause of terror. 1
“The [President] doth protest too much, methinks.” 2 The President has now
equated people advancing “conspiracy theories” as terrorists, enemies of the
State, who advance the cause of terror. It is now taboo and risking appearing
anti-American to suggest any other hypothesis than the “official theory.” What
about the government’s own conspiracy theory? What makes it not outrageous?
How can the President even make that claim only one month after the attacks,
and before any investigation has been done by FEMA or even before the 9/11
Commission is even empanelled? Is any other 9/11 theory besides the
government theory of intelligence failures and a fire based theory of collapse
considered outrageous, even if it can be proven that alternative theories, even
one’s as brazenly controversial as controlled demolition, can be proven?
Governments throughout history have routinely conspired and acted with malice