19.02.2015 Views

The Big Lie 9-11 and Government Complicity in Mass Murder [PDF]

The Big Lie 9-11 and Government Complicity in Mass Murder [PDF]

The Big Lie 9-11 and Government Complicity in Mass Murder [PDF]

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Big</strong> <strong>Lie</strong>” 9/<strong>11</strong> <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Government</strong>’s<br />

<strong>Complicity</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mass</strong> <strong>Murder</strong><br />

128<br />

Diesel fuel, even large storage tanks of diesel, does not have the explosive<br />

capability or compression wave strength to pulverize concrete to f<strong>in</strong>e powder<br />

while also uniformly <strong>and</strong> simultaneously break<strong>in</strong>g steel support jo<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

<strong>The</strong> theory offered by FEMA about the stored diesel fuel contribut<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

collapse is also discredited by FEMA’s admission that the largest tanks<br />

underneath WTC-7 were recovered <strong>in</strong>tact stat<strong>in</strong>g: “To date, the NY State<br />

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) <strong>and</strong> DEC have recovered approximately<br />

20,000 gallons from the other two <strong>in</strong>tact <strong>11</strong>,600-gallon underground fuel oil<br />

storage tanks at WTC 7.” 34 <strong>The</strong> status of other fuel storage areas were considered<br />

unknown. Furthermore, the other fuel storage tanks were not uniformly<br />

distributed throughout the build<strong>in</strong>g. If there was an explosion, it would have been<br />

localized <strong>and</strong> the demolition wave would have dissipated dramatically from the<br />

site of the explosion. <strong>The</strong>y would not have broken the support columns<br />

simultaneously <strong>and</strong> uniformly. <strong>The</strong> collapse would not have been symmetrical<br />

<strong>and</strong> vertical. It would have been a lop-sided collapse.<br />

In regards to WTC-7, Physicist Stephen Jones he writes <strong>in</strong> his hypothesis that,<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to the basic physical laws of Conservation of Momentum, Law of<br />

Increas<strong>in</strong>g Entropy, <strong>and</strong> the Second Law of <strong>The</strong>rmodynamics, that it is, accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to those unbreakable laws, impossible for the fires alone to have caused the<br />

collapses consistent with how they fell. He claims that controlled demolition is<br />

the mechanism that best satisfies the hypothesis <strong>and</strong> Occam’s Razor. He writes:<br />

WTC 7 collapsed rapidly <strong>and</strong> symmetrically -- even though fires were r<strong>and</strong>omly<br />

scattered <strong>in</strong> the build<strong>in</strong>g. WTC 7 fell about seven hours after the Towers<br />

collapsed, even though no major persistent fires were visible. <strong>The</strong>re were twentyfour<br />

huge steel support columns <strong>in</strong>side WTC 7 as well as huge trusses, arranged<br />

asymmetrically, along with approximately 57 perimeter columns. (FEMA, 2002,<br />

chapter 5.) A symmetrical collapse, as observed, evidently requires the<br />

simultaneous “pull<strong>in</strong>g” of most or all of the support columns. <strong>The</strong> Second Law of<br />

<strong>The</strong>rmodynamics implies that the likelihood of complete <strong>and</strong> symmetrical<br />

collapse due to r<strong>and</strong>om fires as <strong>in</strong> the “official” theory is small, s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

asymmetrical failure is so much more likely. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, a major goal of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!