The Big Lie 9-11 and Government Complicity in Mass Murder [PDF]

The Big Lie” 9/11 and the Government’s
Complicity in Mass Murder
136
12. Could Al-Qaeda know that the ANG fighter wings from Andrews would not
be used to defend Washington D.C.? Could Al-Qaeda keep the U.S. fighters
from using their top speeds to intercept suspect aircraft?
13. Could Al-Qaeda schedule a large scale FEMA drill in New York City
conveniently to begin on 9/12?
14. Why were all of the aircraft involved in the attacks only filled with 20% of
capacity of passengers on flights that are normally filled at a minimum of
80% capacity? Why were none of the hijackers Arab names listed on the
flight manifests?
15. Why was the wreckage of Flight 93 spread out over so large a distance, in
some instances several miles from the impact site? Why was their so little
aircraft debris at the impact site, insufficient to account for the mass of a
commercial jetliner? Was Flight 93 shot down as the evidence and several
eye-witness statements suggest? Why were no bodies recovered at the
Flight 93 crash site?
16. Why was the United States, immediately prior to and after 9/11, meeting
with Pakistani ISI spy chief Lt. General Mahmoud Ahmad, the man who
had just wired Mohamed Atta $100,000? 48 On 9/11 Lt. General Ahmad,
the 9/11 money man, was having breakfast with Senator Bob Graham and
Rep. Porter Goss (future CIA Director), chairmen of the Senate and House
Intelligence committees. Why did the U.S. continue to work with the 9/11
financial mastermind through the Afghanistan invasion until India
disclosed his ties to Al Qaeda? Why has this direct financial link between
the Pakistani ISI and Al Qaeda been virtually dropped like a proverbial hot
potato by the 9/11 Commission and the mainstream media? Could it
possibly be that both the ISI and Al Qaeda are “intelligence assets” of the
CIA? 49 Recently, a Pentagon employee has come forward with details on
how he was ordered to destroy documents identifying Mohamed Atta as a
terrorist two years before the attacks on 9/11. Could this be part of a
coverup to obscure Atta’s prior involvement as a CIA asset, code named
Able Danger, 50 and that, in complete refutation of the government’s