19.02.2015 Views

The Big Lie 9-11 and Government Complicity in Mass Murder [PDF]

The Big Lie 9-11 and Government Complicity in Mass Murder [PDF]

The Big Lie 9-11 and Government Complicity in Mass Murder [PDF]

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Big</strong> <strong>Lie</strong>” 9/<strong>11</strong> <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Government</strong>’s<br />

<strong>Complicity</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mass</strong> <strong>Murder</strong><br />

93<br />

weakest areas of the structure, you would have had the disastrous lean<strong>in</strong>g<br />

collapse of the towers, not a perfect symmetrical vertical collapse <strong>in</strong>to its own<br />

footpr<strong>in</strong>t. But <strong>in</strong> fact, there was a lean<strong>in</strong>g of the top 20 floors of the tower, of<br />

about 20° over the vertical axis of the build<strong>in</strong>g. As this section is now over open<br />

air, it should have come down <strong>in</strong>dependently from the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g tower <strong>and</strong> left a<br />

gigantic cube-shaped pile of wreckage on the street below. 41 But none was found;<br />

it broke apart <strong>and</strong> dis<strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong> mid-air from unexpla<strong>in</strong>ed forces. Can<br />

someone expla<strong>in</strong> to me the mechanism that can accomplish that feat that does<br />

not <strong>in</strong>clude high explosives <strong>in</strong> the scenario?<br />

To illustrate this, consider an example of how<br />

a large tree is felled. <strong>The</strong> lumberjack makes a<br />

notch cut <strong>in</strong> the tree <strong>and</strong> it tips <strong>and</strong> falls <strong>in</strong><br />

the direction of least resistance, <strong>and</strong> the giant<br />

tree doesn’t usually break apart <strong>in</strong> mid-air.<br />

For the South Tower, the weakest area would<br />

have been the off-center impact area of the<br />

stricken superstructure, <strong>and</strong> led to an Top floors of WTC-2 lean<strong>in</strong>g over the<br />

center axis almost 20° - notice the blast<br />

asymmetrical collapse. <strong>The</strong> weight of the wave encircl<strong>in</strong>g the build<strong>in</strong>g<br />

upper floors, accord<strong>in</strong>g to the official theory, should have caused a lean<strong>in</strong>g<br />

collapse, not the vertical telescop<strong>in</strong>g that was observed. <strong>The</strong> lean<strong>in</strong>g collapse<br />

would have been event more destructive as debris would have ra<strong>in</strong>ed down on a<br />

wider area <strong>and</strong> struck more build<strong>in</strong>gs. <strong>The</strong> only known mechanism that allows for<br />

a near perfect vertical <strong>and</strong> symmetrical 42 collapse is computer controlled<br />

demolition. Even damaged caused by earthquakes is not as precise as what<br />

happened on 9/<strong>11</strong> with the build<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

<strong>The</strong> WTC Towers Were Built with Robust Build<strong>in</strong>g Designs.<br />

Frank DiMart<strong>in</strong>i, the Manager of WTC Construction <strong>and</strong> Project Management<br />

said that the design of the Towers were to be able to withst<strong>and</strong> multiple strikes<br />

from a 707, then the largest aircraft at the time. He stated <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>terview that:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!