The Big Lie 9-11 and Government Complicity in Mass Murder [PDF]
The Big Lie 9-11 and Government Complicity in Mass Murder [PDF]
The Big Lie 9-11 and Government Complicity in Mass Murder [PDF]
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Big</strong> <strong>Lie</strong>” 9/<strong>11</strong> <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Government</strong>’s<br />
<strong>Complicity</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mass</strong> <strong>Murder</strong><br />
16<br />
<strong>in</strong>audible, <strong>and</strong> hence we can hold the enemy’s fate <strong>in</strong> our h<strong>and</strong>s.” False flag 12<br />
operations are actively go<strong>in</strong>g on even <strong>in</strong> Iraq with the recent disclosure of British<br />
SAS troops caught pos<strong>in</strong>g as <strong>in</strong>surgents with disguises <strong>and</strong> terrorist equipment,<br />
weapons, <strong>and</strong> bombs attempt<strong>in</strong>g to sow seeds of unrest <strong>and</strong> violence with terror<br />
attacks on local populations <strong>and</strong> legitimate Iraqi police. 13 This is clear <strong>and</strong><br />
conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g evidence of governments act<strong>in</strong>g to create crisis situations to<br />
perpetuate the justification for their cont<strong>in</strong>ued presence. <strong>Government</strong>s such as<br />
the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>and</strong> the United States are us<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> have used, elite special<br />
forces to create order out of chaos.<br />
Even more surpris<strong>in</strong>g is the failure of the ma<strong>in</strong>stream press <strong>and</strong> electronic media<br />
to expose the cover, or to <strong>in</strong>tentionally ignore, these obvious <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tentional<br />
government efforts to sabotage of their own stated <strong>in</strong>tentions of provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />
security <strong>and</strong> stability <strong>in</strong> Iraq. <strong>The</strong> reporters officially sanctioned <strong>in</strong> Iraq are called<br />
“embedded journalists,” perhaps they are named that for a subtle reason. In the<br />
world of political “dirty tricks,” politicians <strong>and</strong> others with any mean<strong>in</strong>gful power<br />
or <strong>in</strong>fluence are often compromised <strong>and</strong> pocketed for potential future use by the<br />
controll<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terests by be<strong>in</strong>g filmed <strong>in</strong> bed by some agency with a male or female<br />
prostitute, someone other than their spouses – caught <strong>in</strong> flagrante delicto,<br />
framed <strong>in</strong> some other deviant sexual predilection, bribed, caught <strong>in</strong> crime, or<br />
some of the other known methods of compromis<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual. It seems<br />
apparent that <strong>in</strong>dependent journalists, unembedded, are often the targets of U.S.<br />
tank rounds <strong>in</strong> their hotels, especially after giv<strong>in</strong>g unfavorable reports. 14 That is a<br />
very effective way of ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, if not favorable coverage, then silence – threaten<br />
them with be<strong>in</strong>g targeted, accidentally of course. <strong>The</strong> message is clear, play along<br />
to get along, or we’ll exclude you from news coverage or at worse, we’ll shoot at<br />
you.<br />
Cui bono is a Lat<strong>in</strong> adage co<strong>in</strong>ed by the Roman statesman, dramatist, <strong>and</strong><br />
philosopher Seneca <strong>and</strong> is used <strong>in</strong> basic crim<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>vestigation. It means that one<br />
should beg<strong>in</strong> the search for the culprit from among those that have the most to<br />
ga<strong>in</strong> from a crime. Who benefited after 9/<strong>11</strong>? Who gets more fund<strong>in</strong>g? Who gets