30.03.2015 Views

Engine Titanium Consortium - Center for Nondestructive Evaluation ...

Engine Titanium Consortium - Center for Nondestructive Evaluation ...

Engine Titanium Consortium - Center for Nondestructive Evaluation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Original<br />

Date<br />

Revised<br />

Date<br />

Description<br />

Status<br />

with the ahat vs. a and the Re methods, and<br />

describing and illustrating the advantages of the<br />

new methodology.<br />

Development of the Capability to Make Predictions<br />

of the Local POD in a Final Forging Geometry<br />

24 months Analyze results (anisotropy, geometry effects) of<br />

Production and Inservice Inspection Tasks <strong>for</strong><br />

implications to POD as a function of position in<br />

typical <strong>for</strong>ging geometries. (ISU with support from<br />

AS, PW)<br />

27 months Define implementation plan <strong>for</strong> POD as function of<br />

position. (GE with support from ISU, PW, and AS)<br />

30 months Report providing default POD curves <strong>for</strong> titanium<br />

<strong>for</strong>gings, <strong>for</strong> both production and in-service<br />

inspections, <strong>for</strong> use by the OEMs and FAA in life<br />

management/risk assessment studies.<br />

30 months Initial estimates of POD and PFA <strong>for</strong> sonic-shaped<br />

titanium <strong>for</strong>gings based on use of the FBH, SHA,<br />

CBS data, and field finds.<br />

36 months Complete modeling tools <strong>for</strong> the effects of<br />

geometry on flaw response and noise distributions.<br />

(ISU with support from PW)<br />

36 months Revised estimates of POD as a function of <strong>for</strong>ging<br />

geometry, including effects of anisotropy,<br />

curvature, and position within the <strong>for</strong>ging.<br />

38 months Complete experimental validation of modeling<br />

tools. (PW with support from GE, AS) Complete<br />

the development of the methodology needed to<br />

account <strong>for</strong> positional effects on POD. (ISU with<br />

support from GE, PW, and AS)<br />

40 months Compare with ahat vs. a and the R e methods. (GE<br />

with support from ISU and PW)<br />

42 months Provide updated methodology with POD as<br />

function of position as an output. (ISU)<br />

ongoing<br />

Improvements/Transfer of the POD/PFA<br />

Methodology Software to OEMs<br />

Modify the modeling software if and when<br />

necessitated by experimental data. (ISU)<br />

40 months Provide OEMs with integrated software containing<br />

flaw response and noise models as influenced by<br />

anisotropy and geometry. (ISU)<br />

48 months Review results <strong>for</strong> effects of introducing numerical<br />

approximation methods to the flaw response<br />

surface to speed the operation of the new<br />

methodology. (ISU, with support of AS, GE, PW)<br />

52 months Complete development and integrate validated<br />

methods to add noise to flaw response in c-scan<br />

images in the presence of anisotropy. (ISU with<br />

support from PW)<br />

60 months Provide OEMs with final software and procedure<br />

packages. (ISU)<br />

60 months Report describing the technical details of the POD<br />

prediction methodology <strong>for</strong> sonic-shaped and final<br />

Quarterly Report – January 1, 2002 –March 31, 2002<br />

print date/time: 6/6/2002 - 8:39 AM – Page 103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!