Engine Titanium Consortium - Center for Nondestructive Evaluation ...
Engine Titanium Consortium - Center for Nondestructive Evaluation ...
Engine Titanium Consortium - Center for Nondestructive Evaluation ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Original<br />
Date<br />
Revised<br />
Date<br />
Description<br />
Status<br />
with the ahat vs. a and the Re methods, and<br />
describing and illustrating the advantages of the<br />
new methodology.<br />
Development of the Capability to Make Predictions<br />
of the Local POD in a Final Forging Geometry<br />
24 months Analyze results (anisotropy, geometry effects) of<br />
Production and Inservice Inspection Tasks <strong>for</strong><br />
implications to POD as a function of position in<br />
typical <strong>for</strong>ging geometries. (ISU with support from<br />
AS, PW)<br />
27 months Define implementation plan <strong>for</strong> POD as function of<br />
position. (GE with support from ISU, PW, and AS)<br />
30 months Report providing default POD curves <strong>for</strong> titanium<br />
<strong>for</strong>gings, <strong>for</strong> both production and in-service<br />
inspections, <strong>for</strong> use by the OEMs and FAA in life<br />
management/risk assessment studies.<br />
30 months Initial estimates of POD and PFA <strong>for</strong> sonic-shaped<br />
titanium <strong>for</strong>gings based on use of the FBH, SHA,<br />
CBS data, and field finds.<br />
36 months Complete modeling tools <strong>for</strong> the effects of<br />
geometry on flaw response and noise distributions.<br />
(ISU with support from PW)<br />
36 months Revised estimates of POD as a function of <strong>for</strong>ging<br />
geometry, including effects of anisotropy,<br />
curvature, and position within the <strong>for</strong>ging.<br />
38 months Complete experimental validation of modeling<br />
tools. (PW with support from GE, AS) Complete<br />
the development of the methodology needed to<br />
account <strong>for</strong> positional effects on POD. (ISU with<br />
support from GE, PW, and AS)<br />
40 months Compare with ahat vs. a and the R e methods. (GE<br />
with support from ISU and PW)<br />
42 months Provide updated methodology with POD as<br />
function of position as an output. (ISU)<br />
ongoing<br />
Improvements/Transfer of the POD/PFA<br />
Methodology Software to OEMs<br />
Modify the modeling software if and when<br />
necessitated by experimental data. (ISU)<br />
40 months Provide OEMs with integrated software containing<br />
flaw response and noise models as influenced by<br />
anisotropy and geometry. (ISU)<br />
48 months Review results <strong>for</strong> effects of introducing numerical<br />
approximation methods to the flaw response<br />
surface to speed the operation of the new<br />
methodology. (ISU, with support of AS, GE, PW)<br />
52 months Complete development and integrate validated<br />
methods to add noise to flaw response in c-scan<br />
images in the presence of anisotropy. (ISU with<br />
support from PW)<br />
60 months Provide OEMs with final software and procedure<br />
packages. (ISU)<br />
60 months Report describing the technical details of the POD<br />
prediction methodology <strong>for</strong> sonic-shaped and final<br />
Quarterly Report – January 1, 2002 –March 31, 2002<br />
print date/time: 6/6/2002 - 8:39 AM – Page 103