30.03.2015 Views

Engine Titanium Consortium - Center for Nondestructive Evaluation ...

Engine Titanium Consortium - Center for Nondestructive Evaluation ...

Engine Titanium Consortium - Center for Nondestructive Evaluation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Original<br />

Date<br />

Revised<br />

Date<br />

Description<br />

12/01 Complete combine Effects of Cleanliness Study<br />

and Cleanability & Drying Studies and generate<br />

matrix.<br />

Status<br />

Drying studies completed 6/01;<br />

cleaning study complete 2/02<br />

12/01 Initiate best practices document. Final report in progress. Draft to<br />

FAA 7/02.<br />

2/02 Complete best practices document and provide<br />

recommendations <strong>for</strong> further study.<br />

Final report to FAA in 7/02.<br />

Milestone change summary from the Phase II Technical Proposal – Volume I, Task 2.2.3 dated July<br />

10, 1998.<br />

1.) The industry workshop, month 3 (May 2000) milestone was changed in the February 8 kick-off<br />

meeting to a status update to the ATA September 12 meeting in San Francisco. It was felt that<br />

a month 3 milestone could not provide any input that the OEM experts were not already aware<br />

of and also that the subtask had nothing to communicate to the engine overhaul shops at the<br />

time.<br />

2.) The experimental design, month 3 (May 2000) milestone was set back one month to June to<br />

review contaminates, determine cleaning methods and decide what cleaning methods would be<br />

per<strong>for</strong>med on which contaminate type. Until this was determined, the necessary crack samples<br />

could not be determined and so this also was set back one month.<br />

3.) The team decided that since the “Effect of Cleanliness Study” was very similar to the<br />

Cleanability and Drying Studies, and would at least require crack samples called <strong>for</strong> in this<br />

second study, that the studies be combined. The determination of how clean is clean must<br />

include not just surface cleaning, but crack cleanliness also.<br />

4.) Etching practices study will now be completed at the same time as the cleanability and drying<br />

studies since the sample rendered unusable in the cleanliness study can be and will be used <strong>for</strong><br />

the etching practice study.<br />

Deliverables:<br />

Guidance on an optimal process <strong>for</strong> local etching practices.<br />

Specimen sets as required.<br />

Matrices which define the cleaning effectivity vs. typical engine run hardware contaminants,<br />

detectability <strong>for</strong> various cleaning methods, and detectability <strong>for</strong> various drying methods.<br />

Best Practices Document that provides guidance to the OEMs and airlines and will allow <strong>for</strong> any<br />

necessary specification changes.<br />

Recommendations <strong>for</strong> further work such as a <strong>for</strong>mal POD study.<br />

Metrics:<br />

Improved cleaning and drying processes clearly defined <strong>for</strong> implementation by the industry as part<br />

of FPI used in inspection of critical rotating hardware.<br />

Quarterly Report – January 1, 2002 –March 31, 2002<br />

print date/time: 6/6/2002 - 8:39 AM – Page 84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!