30.03.2015 Views

Engine Titanium Consortium - Center for Nondestructive Evaluation ...

Engine Titanium Consortium - Center for Nondestructive Evaluation ...

Engine Titanium Consortium - Center for Nondestructive Evaluation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Noise C-scans through the “Flat Surfaces” of the Six Specimens<br />

10 MHz, 0.375”D, focal depth in water = 2.65”, Amp=7, Damping=1, Pulse Width = 20ns<br />

Waterpath = 1.0in, Focus ≈ 0.5” deep, Gain = 57.0dB, Gate delay = 0.3in, Gate Range = 0.4in<br />

OD<br />

Thicker region<br />

Thinner region<br />

ID<br />

22.4%<br />

10.0” Radius Convex Block<br />

28.4%<br />

18.8%<br />

4.0” Radius Convex Block<br />

27.2%<br />

17.1%<br />

Flat Reference Block<br />

14.1%<br />

22.9%<br />

0.75” Radius Concave Block<br />

32.8%<br />

23.3%<br />

2.0” Radius Concave Block<br />

32.3%<br />

19.9%<br />

8.0” Radius Concave Block<br />

30.5%<br />

Figure 9. Preliminary C-scans showing gated-peak grain noise levels measured through the flat<br />

surfaces of the six noise curvature blocks. Average noise levels as a percentage of full screen<br />

height are listed.<br />

Noise Measurements thru Flat Entry Surfaces<br />

2.4" water path; 57 dB<br />

Noise Measurements thru Flat Entry Surfaces<br />

2.4" water path; 57 dB<br />

RMS Grain Noise (% of FSH) .<br />

12<br />

Flat, FBHs in back<br />

Flat, FBHs in front<br />

0.75 cv 2.0 cv<br />

10<br />

8.0 cv 4.0 cx<br />

10.0 cx Theory<br />

8<br />

Model assumes: FOM = 1.1* (5.6E-4*freq^1.25)<br />

Atten = 5.7E-4*freq^1.8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Exp. values corrected <strong>for</strong> electronic<br />

noise and Ref signal differences<br />

0<br />

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6<br />

RMS Grain Noise (% of FSH) .<br />

12<br />

Theory<br />

Exp. Ave.<br />

10<br />

Model assumes: FOM = 1.1* (5.6E-4*freq^1.25)<br />

Atten = 5.7E-4*freq^1.8<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Exp. values corrected<strong>for</strong> electronic<br />

noise and Ref signal differences<br />

0<br />

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6<br />

Metal Depth (inches)<br />

Metal Depth (inches)<br />

Figure 10. Comparison of measured and predicted rms grain noise levels <strong>for</strong> inspections through<br />

the flat surfaces of the six noise curvature blocks using a 2.4” water path. Left-hand panel displays<br />

the measured noise levels <strong>for</strong> the six blocks individually, while the right-hand panel displays their<br />

average.<br />

Quarterly Report – January 1, 2002 –March 31, 2002<br />

print date/time: 6/6/2002 - 8:39 AM – Page 46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!