30.03.2015 Views

Engine Titanium Consortium - Center for Nondestructive Evaluation ...

Engine Titanium Consortium - Center for Nondestructive Evaluation ...

Engine Titanium Consortium - Center for Nondestructive Evaluation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Original<br />

Date<br />

Revised<br />

Date<br />

Description<br />

Status<br />

methodology<br />

12 months TBD Report results from applying RDB and CBS data to<br />

validate the ISU models developed in Phase I.<br />

(ISU, with support from AE, GE, PW)<br />

12 months TBD A report assessing success of the Phase I<br />

development of a new POD methodology.<br />

Ongoing<br />

Modify the modeling software if and when<br />

necessitated by experimental data. (ISU)<br />

30 months Review and report on effects on POD of calibration<br />

response variability, and uncertainty in determining<br />

flaw size, conducted on Nickel only. (GE, with<br />

support from ISU) Provide OEMs with integrated<br />

software containing flaw response and noise<br />

models. (ISU)<br />

30 months Report documenting the software and material<br />

characterization procedures with which the OEMs<br />

can implement the new methodology.<br />

48 months Complete development and validation of models <strong>for</strong><br />

the effects of microstructure on beam profiles and<br />

apparent attenuation. (ISU, PW with support from<br />

GE, AE)<br />

60 months<br />

TBD<br />

Provide OEMs with final software and procedure<br />

packages. (ISU)<br />

Completion of full report delayed by<br />

redirection of work.<br />

Completion of full report delayed by<br />

redirection of work.<br />

POD <strong>for</strong> titanium billet – existent/new data analysis,<br />

and use of the CBS<br />

12 months TBD Complete report of analysis of CBS data. (ISU,<br />

with support from AE, GE, PW)<br />

Ongoing<br />

Updated POD estimates <strong>for</strong> naturally occurring<br />

flaws in titanium alloys as new field-find data<br />

become available. (GE, ISU, with support from AE,<br />

ISU)<br />

42 months<br />

Initiate POD assessment of revised inspection<br />

approaches <strong>for</strong> large diameter billet (10″ to 14″).<br />

(PW with support from ISU, GE) Characterize<br />

transducers to be used in inspection of large<br />

diameter billets. (Utilize results from 1.2.1)<br />

42 months Report documenting the revised estimates of POD<br />

<strong>for</strong> larger diameter titanium billet<br />

51 months Predict response <strong>for</strong> large diameter billets. Use<br />

calibration standards, RDB, and chord blocks <strong>for</strong><br />

validation as appropriate. (ISU with support from<br />

PW, GE)<br />

Provide POD estimate <strong>for</strong> larger diameter billet.<br />

(ISU, with support from AE, GE, PW) Compare<br />

results with those from alternative POD<br />

methodologies. (GE, with support from ISU)<br />

51 months Report documenting the estimates of POD and<br />

PFA <strong>for</strong> titanium billet based on use of the random<br />

defect block, CBS data, and data reported to<br />

JETQC, including comparison with POD results<br />

from existent methodologies.<br />

Completion of full report delayed by<br />

redirection of work.<br />

Quarterly Report – January 1, 2002 –March 31, 2002<br />

print date/time: 6/6/2002 - 8:39 AM – Page 94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!