Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy
Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy
Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
and third, nothing intervenes; for no intervals of space disjoin<br />
6 and 6. Thus also unity multiplied into itself, generates<br />
nothing but itself. For that which is without interval does<br />
not possess the power of generating interval. But every number<br />
multiplied into itself, produces another number greater<br />
than itself, because intervals when multiplied, distend themselves<br />
by a greater length of space. That, however, which is<br />
without interval, has not the power of generating more than it<br />
is itself. From this principle, therefore, i.e. from unity, the<br />
first extension into length proceeds, and which unfolds itself<br />
into all numbers from the duad; because the first interval is a<br />
line; but two intervals are length and breadth, i.e. a superficies;<br />
and three intervals, are length, breadth, and depth, i.e.<br />
a solid. But besides these, no other intervals can be found; so<br />
that the six species of motion subsist conformably to the natures<br />
and number of the intervals. For one interval contains in<br />
itself two motions. Thus in length there is before and behind;<br />
in breadth, the right and the left; and in depth, upward and<br />
downward. But it is necessary that every solid body should<br />
have length, breadth, and depth; and that whatever contains<br />
these three dimensions in itself, should be a solid. Since therefore,<br />
a line surpasses a point by one dimension, viz. by length,<br />
but a superficies surpasses it by two dimensions, i.e. by length<br />
and breadth, and a solid surpasses it by three dimensions, i.e.<br />
by length, breadth, and depth, it is evident that a point itself is<br />
without any corporeal magnitude, or dimension of interval; is<br />
the principle of all intervals; and is naturally incapable of being<br />
divided. Hence a point is the principle of the first interval,<br />
yet is not itself interval; and is the summit of a line, but is not<br />
yet a line. Thus too a line is the principle of a superficies, but<br />
is not itself a superficies; and is the summit of the second interval,<br />
yet retains no vestige of the second interval. And thus<br />
also a superficies is the principle of a solid, but is itself neither