13.04.2015 Views

Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy

Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy

Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

dissimilarly similar to divinity. It is similar, so far as it alone<br />

subsists by a negation of all things. But it is dissimilarly similar,<br />

because divinity is better and beyond all things, but matter<br />

is worse than, and below all things.<br />

Again, when they said that the monad in reality mingled<br />

and is the recipient of all things, this likewise was asserted by<br />

them from the analogy of the monad to deity; for all things<br />

are mingled by and comprehended in the ineffable nature of<br />

divinity. But they called it chaos from resembling the infinite,<br />

for chaos, according to Pythagoras," is analogous to infinity, in<br />

the same manner as ether is said by him to correspond to<br />

bound. And bound and infinity are the two great principles cf<br />

things immediately posterior to the ineffable. For the same<br />

reason they called it a chasm. But they called it confusion,<br />

commixture, obscurity, and darkness, because in the ineffable<br />

principle of things of which it is the image, all things are profoundly<br />

one without any separation or distinction, as being all<br />

things prior to all, and in consequence of being involved in unfathomable<br />

depths, are concealed in unknown obscurity and<br />

darkness. Hence, as we are informed by Damascius in his admirable<br />

MS. treatise ?FEPC ~ P X ~ the V , Egyptians asserted nothing<br />

of the first principle of things, but celebrated it as a thrice unknown<br />

darkness transcending all intellectual perception. ~V~PVqxagrv<br />

rporqv ap~qv QXOTO~ UZEQ ~(XOQV VO'IJGCV, 0x0~0~ ayvamov, TQIG<br />

7097~ ~VTPILOV~~S. AS Tartarus too subsists at the extremity<br />

of the universe, in a descending series, it is dissimilarly similar<br />

to the ineffable which is the extremity of things in an ascending<br />

series. But when they called the monad Styx, it was in<br />

consequence of looking to its immutable nature. For Styx, according<br />

to its first subsistence, is the cause by which divine natures<br />

retain an immutable sameness of essence; for this is the<br />

occult meaning of the fabulous assertion, that the Gods swear<br />

* See the notes to my translation of Aristotle's Metaphysics.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!