13.04.2015 Views

Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy

Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy

Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BOOK Two 97<br />

are opposite to those above mentioned. The philosophers however,<br />

posterior to Plato and Aristotle, on account of the perfection<br />

of the decad according to Pythagoras, added four other<br />

middles, that in these proportionalities a decad might be formed.<br />

It is indeed in conformity ta this number, that the former<br />

five habitudes and comparisons, which we have discussed, are<br />

described; where to the five greater proportions, which we<br />

called leaders, we adapted other less terms which we called<br />

attendants. Hence it is evident, that in the description of the<br />

ten predicaments by Aristotle, and prior to him by Archytas<br />

(though it is considered as dubious by some, whether these<br />

predicaments were invented by Archytas), the Pythagoric decad<br />

is to be found.<br />

Let us now, however, direct our attention to proportionalities<br />

and middles. And, in the first place, let us discuss that<br />

middle which preserves the habitudes of terms according to<br />

equality of quantity, neglecting similitude of ratio. But with<br />

these quantities that middle is conversant in which there is an<br />

equal difference of the terms from each other. What the difference<br />

of terms is, however, has been before defined. And<br />

that this middle is arithmetical, the ratio itself of numbers will<br />

evince, because its proportion consists in the quantity of number.<br />

What then is the reason that the arithmetical habitude<br />

is prior to all other proportionalities ? In the first place, it is<br />

because the natural series of numbers in which there is the<br />

same difference of the terms, comprehends this middle. For<br />

the terms differ from each other by unity, by the fecundity of<br />

which the nature of number is first unfolded. In the second<br />

place, it is because, as was observed in the first chapter of the<br />

first book, arithmetic is prior both to geometry and music; the<br />

two latter cointroducing at the same time the former; and the<br />

former when subverted, subverting the two latter. The discussion,<br />

therefore, will proceed in order, if we first begin from

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!