13.04.2015 Views

Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy

Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy

Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ples of these; referring the point indeed, as being impartible<br />

to the monad, but a line as the first interval to the duad; and<br />

again, a superficies, as having a more abundant interval to the<br />

triad; and a solid to the tetrad. They also called, as is evident<br />

from the testimony of Aristotle, the first length the duad; for<br />

it is not simply length, but the first length, in order that by<br />

this they might signify cause. In a similar manner also, they<br />

denominated the first breadth, the triad; and the first depth<br />

the tetrad. They also referred to formal principles all psychical<br />

knowledge. And intellectual knowledge indeed, as being<br />

contracted according to impartible union, they referred to the<br />

monad; but scientific knowledge, as being evolved, and as<br />

proceeding from cause to the thing caused, yet through the<br />

inerratic, and always through the same things, they referred<br />

to the duad; and opinion to the triad, because the power of it<br />

is not always directed to the same thing, but at one time inclines<br />

to the true, and at another to the false. And they referred<br />

sense to the tetrad, because it has an apprehension of<br />

bodies; for in the duad indeed, there is one interval from one<br />

monad to the other; but in the triad there are two intervals<br />

from any one monad to the rest; and in the tetrad there are<br />

three. They referred, therefore, to principles every thing<br />

knowable, viz. beings, and the gnostic powers of these. But<br />

they divided beings not according to breadth, but according<br />

to depth; into intelligibles, objects of science, objects of opinion,<br />

and sensibles. In a similar manner, also they divided<br />

knowledge into intellect, science, opinion, and sense. The<br />

extremity, therefore, of the intelligible triad, or animal itself,<br />

as it is called by Plato in the Timaeus, is assumed from the<br />

division of the objects of knowledge, manifesting the intelligible<br />

order, in which forms themselves, viz. the first forms<br />

and the principles of these, are contained, viz. the idea of the<br />

one itself, of the first length, which is the duad itself, and also<br />

the ideas of the first breadth and the first depth; (for in com-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!