Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy
Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy
Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ples of these; referring the point indeed, as being impartible<br />
to the monad, but a line as the first interval to the duad; and<br />
again, a superficies, as having a more abundant interval to the<br />
triad; and a solid to the tetrad. They also called, as is evident<br />
from the testimony of Aristotle, the first length the duad; for<br />
it is not simply length, but the first length, in order that by<br />
this they might signify cause. In a similar manner also, they<br />
denominated the first breadth, the triad; and the first depth<br />
the tetrad. They also referred to formal principles all psychical<br />
knowledge. And intellectual knowledge indeed, as being<br />
contracted according to impartible union, they referred to the<br />
monad; but scientific knowledge, as being evolved, and as<br />
proceeding from cause to the thing caused, yet through the<br />
inerratic, and always through the same things, they referred<br />
to the duad; and opinion to the triad, because the power of it<br />
is not always directed to the same thing, but at one time inclines<br />
to the true, and at another to the false. And they referred<br />
sense to the tetrad, because it has an apprehension of<br />
bodies; for in the duad indeed, there is one interval from one<br />
monad to the other; but in the triad there are two intervals<br />
from any one monad to the rest; and in the tetrad there are<br />
three. They referred, therefore, to principles every thing<br />
knowable, viz. beings, and the gnostic powers of these. But<br />
they divided beings not according to breadth, but according<br />
to depth; into intelligibles, objects of science, objects of opinion,<br />
and sensibles. In a similar manner, also they divided<br />
knowledge into intellect, science, opinion, and sense. The<br />
extremity, therefore, of the intelligible triad, or animal itself,<br />
as it is called by Plato in the Timaeus, is assumed from the<br />
division of the objects of knowledge, manifesting the intelligible<br />
order, in which forms themselves, viz. the first forms<br />
and the principles of these, are contained, viz. the idea of the<br />
one itself, of the first length, which is the duad itself, and also<br />
the ideas of the first breadth and the first depth; (for in com-