13.04.2015 Views

Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy

Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy

Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the image of the never-failing and intelligible duad, is called<br />

indefinite. While this proceeds to all things, it is not deserted<br />

in its course by the monad, but that which proceeds from the<br />

monad continually distinguishes and forms boundless quantity,<br />

gives a specific distinction to all its orderly progressions, and<br />

incessantly adorns them with forms. And as in mundane<br />

natures, there is neither any thing formless, nor any vacuum<br />

among the species of things, so likewise in mathematical number,<br />

neither is any quantity left innumerable, for thus the forming<br />

power of the monad would be vanquished by the indefinite<br />

duad, nor does any medium intervene between the consequent<br />

numbers, and the well-disposed energy of the monad.<br />

Neither, therefore, does the pentad consist of substance and<br />

accident, as a white man; nor of genus and difference, as man<br />

of animal and biped; nor of five monads mutually touching<br />

each other, like a bundle of wood; nor of things mingled, like<br />

a drink made from wine and honey; nor of things sustaining<br />

position, as stones by their position complete the house; nor<br />

lastly, as things numerable, for these are nothing else than particulars.<br />

But it does not follow that numbers themselves,<br />

because they consist of indivisible monads, have nothing else<br />

besides monads; (for the multitude of points in continued<br />

quantity is an indivisible multitude, yet it is not on this account<br />

that there is a completion of something else from the points<br />

themselves) but this takes place because there is something in<br />

them which corresponds to matter, and something which corresponds<br />

to form. Lastly, when we unite the triad with the<br />

tetrad, we say that we make seven. The assertion, however, is<br />

not true: for monads conjoined with monads, produce indeed<br />

the subject of the number 7, but nothing more. Who<br />

then imparts the heptadic form to these monads? Who is it<br />

also that gives the form of a bed to a certain number of pieces<br />

of wood Shall we not say that the soul of the carpenter,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!