13.04.2015 Views

Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy

Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy

Taylor - Theoretic Arithmetic.pdf - Platonic Philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

since it is not possible for division to proceed beyond the<br />

monad. For if we divide the one which is in sensibles into<br />

parts, again the one becomes multitude and many; and by a<br />

subtraction of each of the parts we end in one. And if we<br />

again divide this one into parts, the parts will become multitude;<br />

and by an ablation of each of the parts, we shall at<br />

length arrive at unity. So that the one so far as one is impartible<br />

and indivisible. For another number indeed when divided<br />

is diminished, and is divided into parts less than itself. Thus<br />

for instance, 6 may be divided into 3 and 3, or into 4 and 2,<br />

or into 5 and 1. But the one in sensibles, if it is divided indeed,<br />

as body it is diminished, and by section is divided into<br />

parts less than itself, but as number it is increased; for instead<br />

of the one it becomes many. So that according to this the one<br />

is impartible. For nothing (in sensibles) which is divided, is<br />

divided into parts greater than itself; but that which is divided<br />

into parts greater than the whole, and into parts equal to the<br />

whole, is divided as number. Thus if the one which is in sensibles,<br />

be divided into six equal parts, as number indeed, it will<br />

be divided into parts equal to the whole, viz. into 1.1.1.1.1.1.<br />

and also into parts greater than the whole, viz. into 4 and 2;<br />

for 4 and 2 as numbers are more than one. Hence the monad<br />

as number is indivisible. But it is called the monad, either<br />

from remaining immutable, and not departing from its own<br />

nature; for as often as the monad is multiplied into itself, it<br />

remains the monad; since once one is one; and if we multiply<br />

the monad to infinity, it still continues to be the monad. Or it<br />

is called the monad, because it is separated, and remains by<br />

itself alone apart from the remaining multitude of numbers.*<br />

Archytas and Philolaus, as we are informed by Theo, called indiscriminately<br />

the one, the monad, and the monad, the one. But according to the best of the<br />

Platonists, Proclus, Dunrscius, & in divine natures the mod is that which contains<br />

distinct, but at cbe same time profoundly-unied multitude; and the one is<br />

the summit of the many, so that thk one is more simple than the monad. Observe

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!