FWSN-advisorybd-repo.. - The Connecticut Juvenile Justice Alliance

RECOMMENDATION FIVE
MAKE NEEDED CHANGES TO THE FAMILIES WITH SERVICE
NEEDS LAW TO ENSURE PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS, ALLOW
FOR THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION WITHOUT AFFECTING
DUE PROCESS CONSIDERATIONS AND ADHERE TO FEDERAL
REQUIREMENTS.
• Confidentiality
Currently, Section 46b-124(j) provides that mental health screenings and assessment of
delinquent children are to be used solely for planning and treatment purposes and are
otherwise confidential. This prevents statements the child may make during such
assessment from being used against the child in any court hearing. It is recommended that
FWSN children, who will be screened and assessed by probation officers to ascertain
appropriate diversionary services, be afforded the same protections as delinquent
children.
• Procedural Safeguards
‣ Child as the subject of the Families with Service Needs;
‣ Permanency Plan Review Hearings;
‣ FWSN Supervision
In a family with service needs (FWSN) case, the child is the respondent and the court
only adjudicates the child as an individual, not the family. The current statute erroneously
refers, in several instances, to adjudicating the family rather than the child. Adjudicating
the family is illogical in many FWSN matters, as the allegations and grounds pertain to
the conduct of the child, not the family, and in some cases, mainly those alleging the
child is beyond control, the parent is the complainant. It also is recommended that the
word “placement” in Section 46b-148 be substituted for “commitment” in subsection (a)
to avoid confusion with an actual commitment to the department of children and families.
Revisions are proposed to Section 46b-149. A new subsection (i) is proposed because it
has been the practice to modify and enlarge the conditions of FWSN supervision in the
same manner afforded to the court with respect to probation orders in Section 46b-140a.
The court should be afforded such flexibility, particularly after an alleged violation has
taken place, to ensure appropriate services and sufficient time to measure their
effectiveness.
Amendments to subsections (j) and (k) are recommended because extensions and
revocations of commitments for both child protection matters (Section 46b-129(k)) and
delinquency cases (Section 46b-141(b)) are now done by motion. The addition of
language contemplating permanency plans for committed FWSN children and motions to
10