Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority Contract ... - Tri Delta Transit
Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority Contract ... - Tri Delta Transit
Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority Contract ... - Tri Delta Transit
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3. Knowledge of and experience with enterprise fund accounting systems.<br />
4. Knowledge of and experience with public transit agencies.<br />
5. Qualifications, knowledge and experience of proposers’ staff performing the<br />
audit.<br />
6. Completeness and thoroughness of the technical proposal.<br />
7. Completeness and thoroughness of the price proposal.<br />
8. References.<br />
9. Price – ECCTA will evaluate proposals for award purposes by including only the<br />
price for the basic requirements as listed on ECCTA’s Price Proposal Form; not<br />
any option items.<br />
ECCTA’s Technical Review Committee may use more detailed unstated criteria as long as those<br />
criteria generally correlate with or logically might be included within the scope of those stated<br />
above. ECCTA may revise the evaluation criteria during the course of the review periods. Such<br />
revisions will be made by written addenda. All proposers within the competitive range will be<br />
allowed to supplement their proposals in response to those revisions in evaluation criteria.<br />
The Technical Review Committee may use numerical scores in applying the evaluation criteria.<br />
The significance of the difference in numerical scores is not the numerical difference, per se, but<br />
is based on the considered judgment of the Technical Review Committee.<br />
Thus, proposals with essentially equal total scores may be deemed significantly different because<br />
of the significance of differences in scores on individual evaluation criteria. Likewise, proposals<br />
with substantially different total numerical scores may be deemed essentially equal.<br />
ECCTA has attempted to state the evaluation criteria in a manner that makes the relative<br />
importance of each criterion readily apparent. Any prospective proposer that is unsure about the<br />
meaning or relative importance of an evaluation criterion should request clarification as soon as<br />
possible.<br />
8. <strong>Contra</strong>ct Award Period<br />
Notification<br />
Upon completion of the Technical Review Committee’s final evaluation, the highest ranked<br />
proposer shall be notified of being selected for contract award.<br />
If the selected proposer fails to provide all required information, documents, etc. in a timely<br />
manner or otherwise declines to perform, ECCTA may terminate negotiations and offer award to<br />
the next highest ranked proposer.<br />
19