29.04.2015 Views

Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority Contract ... - Tri Delta Transit

Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority Contract ... - Tri Delta Transit

Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority Contract ... - Tri Delta Transit

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. Knowledge of and experience with enterprise fund accounting systems.<br />

4. Knowledge of and experience with public transit agencies.<br />

5. Qualifications, knowledge and experience of proposers’ staff performing the<br />

audit.<br />

6. Completeness and thoroughness of the technical proposal.<br />

7. Completeness and thoroughness of the price proposal.<br />

8. References.<br />

9. Price – ECCTA will evaluate proposals for award purposes by including only the<br />

price for the basic requirements as listed on ECCTA’s Price Proposal Form; not<br />

any option items.<br />

ECCTA’s Technical Review Committee may use more detailed unstated criteria as long as those<br />

criteria generally correlate with or logically might be included within the scope of those stated<br />

above. ECCTA may revise the evaluation criteria during the course of the review periods. Such<br />

revisions will be made by written addenda. All proposers within the competitive range will be<br />

allowed to supplement their proposals in response to those revisions in evaluation criteria.<br />

The Technical Review Committee may use numerical scores in applying the evaluation criteria.<br />

The significance of the difference in numerical scores is not the numerical difference, per se, but<br />

is based on the considered judgment of the Technical Review Committee.<br />

Thus, proposals with essentially equal total scores may be deemed significantly different because<br />

of the significance of differences in scores on individual evaluation criteria. Likewise, proposals<br />

with substantially different total numerical scores may be deemed essentially equal.<br />

ECCTA has attempted to state the evaluation criteria in a manner that makes the relative<br />

importance of each criterion readily apparent. Any prospective proposer that is unsure about the<br />

meaning or relative importance of an evaluation criterion should request clarification as soon as<br />

possible.<br />

8. <strong>Contra</strong>ct Award Period<br />

Notification<br />

Upon completion of the Technical Review Committee’s final evaluation, the highest ranked<br />

proposer shall be notified of being selected for contract award.<br />

If the selected proposer fails to provide all required information, documents, etc. in a timely<br />

manner or otherwise declines to perform, ECCTA may terminate negotiations and offer award to<br />

the next highest ranked proposer.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!