Meeting-The-Challenge-Making-a-Difference-Practitioner-Guide
Meeting-The-Challenge-Making-a-Difference-Practitioner-Guide
Meeting-The-Challenge-Making-a-Difference-Practitioner-Guide
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PRACTICAL GUIDANCE<br />
6) ISSUES OF POWER<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is an inherent power imbalance between people who use<br />
services and staff that provide the service. Traditionally most<br />
professional trainings and services were based on a view of staff<br />
as holders of knowledge and expertise, and service users as ill,<br />
damaged, and therefore incapable. On a conscious level, many<br />
staff no longer believe this but services are usually framed with<br />
this model of ‘knowledgeable professional helper’ (staff) and<br />
‘person to be fixed/helped’ (service user) at its core.<br />
• Meaningful involvement requires everyone to reconsider and try<br />
to step outside these roles.<br />
• Letting go of a position of ‘knowing’, which is so often a part of<br />
our professional identity, and inviting others to see our<br />
uncertainty, is often very unsettling and can be uncomfortable.<br />
This can also be the case for service users; for some, inhabiting a<br />
position of responsibility and authority will be a new experience<br />
which challenges assumptions they may hold about their own<br />
capabilities and identity.<br />
• This does not mean devaluing the expertise and knowledge which<br />
staff have, but rather, recognising that service users have different<br />
forms of expertise and knowledge. <strong>The</strong> potential of involvement<br />
to deliver change and improve services arises from bringing<br />
together these two different types of knowledge and expertise.<br />
• Power differences can also arise<br />
from lots of other factors such<br />
as age, gender, level of<br />
education and social class.<strong>The</strong>se<br />
equally need to be attended<br />
to and carefully considered.<br />
• Both staff and service users<br />
benefit from reflective space<br />
where these issues can be<br />
honestly explored.<br />
7) FEEDBACK<br />
<strong>The</strong> process of involvement<br />
does not end with the activity<br />
itself; feeding back what has<br />
happened as a result of service<br />
users’ input is crucial.<br />
• We’ve all been in situations<br />
where we are asked our views<br />
and then hear nothing more –<br />
it’s frustrating and prompts the<br />
question, what was the point?<br />
• Providing feedback helps<br />
to maintain involvement in<br />
future activity.<br />
REVIEW THE<br />
PROCESS:<br />
WHAT WORKED WELL<br />
AND WHAT MIGHT<br />
YOU DO DIFFERENTLY<br />
NEXT TIME?<br />
IDENTIFY<br />
INVOLVEMENT<br />
OPPORTUNITIES<br />
CONSIDER THE<br />
NATURE OF THE<br />
ROLES/ACTIVITIES/<br />
WHO/HOW<br />
FEEDBACK WHAT<br />
HAS HAPPENED<br />
WITH THE<br />
INFORMATION<br />
GATHERED<br />
PROVIDE<br />
SUPPORT<br />
AND PAYMENT<br />
AS NEEDED<br />
UNDERTAKE<br />
CONSULTATION/<br />
COLLABORATIVE<br />
WORK<br />
63