16.11.2012 Views

Wireless Network Design: Optimization Models and Solution ...

Wireless Network Design: Optimization Models and Solution ...

Wireless Network Design: Optimization Models and Solution ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

108 Eli Olinick<br />

levels (possibly less than P target) as long as the SIR for each connection is at least<br />

SIRmin. Allowing mobiles to reduce transmission power can lead to more efficient<br />

use of system resources, however the resulting mathematical programming model<br />

is a nonlinear integer program that is extremely difficult to solve to provable optimality.<br />

In Sections 5.3.2 <strong>and</strong> 5.3.3 we build up to the comprehensive planning<br />

model depicted in Figures 5.1 <strong>and</strong> 5.2. The model presented in Section 5.3.2 extends<br />

ACMIP to maximize profit subject to government-imposed minimum-service<br />

requirements. This model is then extended in Section 5.3.3 to include network infrastructure<br />

(i.e, MTSOs, PSTN gateways, <strong>and</strong> the backbone links). We discuss the<br />

trade-off between profit <strong>and</strong> power in Section 5.3.4 <strong>and</strong> conclude by outlining other<br />

design considerations that researchers have incorporated into the these models in<br />

Section 5.3.5.<br />

5.3.1 SIR-Based Power Control<br />

In their computational study Amaldi et al. observed that SIR values often exceed<br />

SIRmin in solutions to ACMIP [7]. That is, after the tower location <strong>and</strong> subscriber<br />

assignment decisions have been made it may turn out that an acceptable SIR can be<br />

achieved even if signals from certain test points are received at their assigned towers<br />

at power levels less than P target. This means that system resources can be used more efficiently<br />

by allowing mobiles at appropriate test points to transmit at reduced power<br />

levels. This improves the total transmission power term in the objective function<br />

(5.4) <strong>and</strong> reduces interference systemwide thereby increasing capacity. For a given<br />

solution to ACMIP, an iterative power-control algorithm given by Yates [57] can<br />

determine transmission powers at the test points to minimize total transmit power<br />

under minimum SIR constraints. While this approach cannot be directly embedded<br />

in ACMIP, it can be approximated by using a more sophisticated SIR-Based Power<br />

Control model. As an alternative to assuming that each connection is received at<br />

P target, Amaldi et al. [7] propose a model in which the transmission power of a mobile<br />

at test point m is a decision variable, pm. In this model, the signal from test point<br />

m is received by tower ℓ at power level pmgmℓ, <strong>and</strong> the total strength of all signals<br />

received at tower ℓ (assuming all test points are covered) is ∑i∈M di pigiℓ. The model<br />

assumes that there is a thermal or background noise of η (typically -130 dB) at each<br />

tower location. If test point m is assigned to tower ℓ, then the SIR for the connection<br />

is<br />

pmgmℓ<br />

∑i∈M dipigiℓ + η − pmgmℓ<br />

. (5.14)<br />

Thus, the model imposes the following set of constraints for each allowable test<br />

point assignment:<br />

xmℓ(∑ di pigiℓ + η − pmgmℓ) ≤<br />

i∈M<br />

pmgmℓ<br />

SIRmin<br />

∀m ∈ M,ℓ ∈ Lm. (5.15)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!