16.11.2012 Views

Wireless Network Design: Optimization Models and Solution ...

Wireless Network Design: Optimization Models and Solution ...

Wireless Network Design: Optimization Models and Solution ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

144 Jeff Kennington, Jason Kratz, <strong>and</strong> Gheorghe Spiride<br />

of WLANs that may be modeled as integer programming problems. One model involves<br />

the assignment of frequencies to a fixed set of APs. Another is to find the<br />

minimum number <strong>and</strong> location of APs that will provide coverage to a given area.<br />

The most sophisticated model is our new formulation to determine the location,<br />

power, <strong>and</strong> frequency assignment of a fixed number of APs to maximize the capacity<br />

of a new WLAN. Our formulation is for the static problem with known MD<br />

locations. Research is needed to develop good solution algorithms for this problem.<br />

The dynamic version of this design problem arises when the precise location <strong>and</strong><br />

number of MDs requesting service varies by day <strong>and</strong> time of day. In this case, the<br />

best design is one that maximizes the expected capacity over a large number of potential<br />

MD configurations. Hence, a robust design is preferable for the dynamic case<br />

<strong>and</strong> research is also needed for this version of the problem.<br />

Appendix A: Attenuation Calculation<br />

Several models are available to determine the attenuation between a pair of locations.<br />

The path loss is the signal attenuation given in dB, <strong>and</strong> is defined as the difference<br />

between the transmitted power at the source location <strong>and</strong> the received power<br />

at the destination location. Many factors affect path loss between two locations in a<br />

particular setting, including distance, the presence <strong>and</strong> nature of obstacles, interference<br />

with other signals or reflected copies of the signal, etc. The presentation that<br />

we follow in this Appendix is based on [16] where path loss (PL) is defined on p.<br />

108, equation 4.5 by<br />

PL = 10log Pt<br />

(A.1)<br />

Pr<br />

where Pt is the transmitted power, <strong>and</strong> Pr is the received power. This equation can<br />

be rewritten as<br />

− PL<br />

Pr = Pt10 10 (A.2)<br />

Path loss can also be calculated directly between a pair of locations, given in [16]<br />

on p. 161, equation 4.93 by<br />

PL = PL0 + 10nlog d<br />

+ Xσ<br />

d0<br />

(A.3)<br />

where PL0 is the known path loss between locations at a distance of d0, d is the<br />

distance between the source <strong>and</strong> destination location, n is a constant determined<br />

by the medium of transfer, <strong>and</strong> Xσ is a r<strong>and</strong>om variable representing noise. For<br />

simplicity, the remainder of this description we assume Xσ = 0 <strong>and</strong> that path loss is<br />

simply a function of distance. In practice, the other factors mentioned earlier would<br />

contribute to path loss, however a detailed presentation is outside of the scope of<br />

this presentation.<br />

Rappaport [16] gives n = 3.27 in Table 4.7 on p. 165, <strong>and</strong> we use that number.<br />

Rappaport also gives a value for PL0 for a d0 = 1 meter. This value can be calculated

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!